Malasky v. Metal Products Corp.

Decision Date29 May 1997
Citation695 A.2d 539,241 Conn. 906
PartiesDeborah MALASKY v. METAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION et al.
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court

Robert L. Hirtle and Brendan T. Flynn, Hartford, in support of the petition.

Defendant Sidney Greenberg's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn.App. 446, 689 A.2d 1145 (AC 15361), is denied.

BORDEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Miner v. Town of Cheshire
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Connecticut
    • September 29, 2000
    ...244, 247 (D.Conn.1999), citing Malasky v. Metal Products Corp., 44 Conn.App. 446, 454, 689 A.2d 1145 (1997), cert. denied, 241 Conn. 906, 695 A.2d 539 (1997). Statute of Title VII requires plaintiffs to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing an action for damages in federal court. ......
  • Ware v. State
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • November 24, 2009
    ...Commission (EEOC)] filing requirements, the same rationale applies to the requirements of the [commission]"), cert. denied, 241 Conn. 906, 695 A.2d 539 (1997). The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit "has recognized that [a] claim is considered reasonably related if the co......
  • Eagen v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • May 22, 2012
    ...Opportunity Commission] filing requirements, the same rationale applies to the requirements of the [commission]'), cert. denied,241 Conn. 906, 695 A.2d 539 (1997).'' Ware v. State, 118 Conn. App. 65, 82, 983 A.2d 853 (2009). We conclude that federal law is an appropriate guide in this retal......
  • Eagen v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, No. 33241.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • May 22, 2012
    ...Commission] filing requirements, the same rationale applies to the requirements of the [commission]’), cert. denied, 241 Conn. 906, 695 A.2d 539 (1997).” Ware v. State, 118 Conn.App. 65, 82, 983 A.2d 853 (2009). We conclude that federal law is an appropriate guide in this retaliation case. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT