Mallory & Evans Contractors & Engineers, LLC v. Tuskegee Univ.

Citation663 F.3d 1304,274 Ed. Law Rep. 401,23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 614
Decision Date05 December 2011
Docket NumberNo. 11–10940.,11–10940.
PartiesMALLORY & EVANS CONTRACTORS & ENGINEERS, LLC, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY, Defendant–Appellee.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Dana Brent Miles, Lauren Clipp Giles, Miles, Patterson, Hansford, Tallant LLC, Cumming, GA, Robert T. Meadows, III, Capell & Howard, PC, Opelika, AL, for PlaintiffAppellant.

Fred David Gray, Jr., Fred D. Gray, Sr., Gray, Langford, Sapp, McGowan, Gray, Gray & Nathan, Tuskegee, AL, for DefendantAppellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama.Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, COX, Circuit Judge, and HUNT,* District Judge.PER CURIAM:

The district court's jurisdiction in this case is not contested, but jurisdiction cannot be created by consent. Lowry v. Int'l Bhd. of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders & Helpers of Am., 259 F.2d 568, 575 (5th Cir.1958). We are obligated to raise concerns about the district court's subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte. Fitzgerald v. Seaboard Sys. R.R., Inc., 760 F.2d 1249, 1251 (11th Cir.1985) (citation omitted).

The complaint in this case alleges that Plaintiff Mallory & Evans Contractors and Engineers, LLC (Mallory & Evans) is a “Limited Liability Company created under the laws of the State of Georgia with [i]ts principal place of business ... in Scottdale, Georgia.” (Dkt 1 at 1.) This is an insufficient allegation of its citizenship. In Rolling Greens MHP, L.P. v. Comcast SCH Holdings, L.L.C., 374 F.3d 1020, 1022 (11th Cir.2004), we held that a limited liability company, like a partnership, “is a citizen of any state of which a member of the company is a citizen.” We continued: “To sufficiently allege the citizenships of these unincorporated business entities, a party must list the citizenships of all the members of the limited liability company....” Id.

Additionally, the complaint alleges that Defendant Tuskegee University (Tuskegee) is “an Alabama institution of higher learning, located in Macon County, Alabama.” (Dkt 1 at 1.) This, too, is an insufficient allegation of citizenship. Section 1332 does not mention institutions of higher learning. 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (2006).

The complaint should allege the citizenship of both Mallory & Evans and Tuskegee. Because we suspect there may be diversity of citizenship, Mallory & Evans is invited to file in this court (within fourteen days after the date of this order) a motion for leave to amend the complaint to correct the deficient allegations of citizenship. “Defective allegations of jurisdiction may be amended, upon terms, in the trial or appellate courts.” 28 U.S.C. § 1653 (2006). See also Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, N.J. v. Robbins Coal Co., 288 F.2d 349, 350 (5th Cir.1961). The...

To continue reading

Request your trial
99 cases
  • Nance v. Comm'r, Ga. Dep't of Corr., No. 20-11393
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • December 2, 2020
    ...STANDARD OF REVIEW We are obligated to address subject-matter jurisdiction sua sponte . Mallory & Evans Contractors & Eng'rs, LLC v. Tuskegee Univ. , 663 F.3d 1304, 1304 (11th Cir. 2011). A district court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over a state prisoner's second or successive petitio......
  • Worthington Fed. Bank v. Everest Nat'l Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • June 4, 2015
    ...may be ascertained under federal standards applicable to the particular type of entity. See Mallory & Evans Contractors & Eng'rs, LLC v. Tuskegee Univ., 663 F.3d 1304, 1305 (11th Cir.2011) ; Underwriters of Lloyd's, London, 613 F.3d at 1089 ; Rolling Greens MHP, LP v. Comcast SCH Holdings L......
  • Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Dolgencorp, LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • March 5, 2014
    ...of jurisdiction may be amended, upon terms, in the trial or appellate courts.”); Mallory & Evans Contractors & Eng'rs, LLC v. Tuskegee Univ., 663 F.3d 1304, 1305 (11th Cir.2011) (per curiam). Therefore, appellate and subject matter jurisdiction are proper. See28 U.S.C. § 1291; id. § 1332.B.......
  • Eggelston v. Marshall Durbin Food Corp., CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:10-cv-02290-JEO
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • December 23, 2015
    ...subject-matter jurisdiction to plead allegations sufficient to support its existence. See Mallory & Evans Contractors & Engineers, LLC v. Tuskegee Univ., 663 F.3d 1304, 1305 (11th Cir. 2011). It cannot be formally determined from the materials before it, including the pleadings and motions ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT