Mamonov v. Marrero ex rel. M.N.

• Decision Date: 12 August 2020
• Docket Number: No. 3D19-120,3D19-120
• Citation: 306 So.3d 1068 (Mem)
• Parties: Pavel MAMONOV, Appellant, v. Olga MARRERO o/b/o M.N., Appellee.
• Court: Florida District Court of Appeals

306 So.3d 1068 (Mem)

Pavel MAMONOV, Appellant,

v.Olga MARRERO o/b/o M.N., Appellee.

No. 3D19-120

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Opinion filed August 12, 2020.

Kuehne Davis Law, P.A., and Benedict P. Kuehne and Michael T. Davis, for appellant.

Amanda L. Neff (Tallahassee), for appellee.

Before SALTER, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of injunction for protection against sexual violence. We affirm, based on substantial competent evidence in the record, section 784.046, Florida Statutes (2017), and our conclusion that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in conducting an in-camera interview of the twelve-year-old victim and considering the child's statements under section 90.803(23) of the Florida Evidence Code. Rodriguez v. State, 77 So. 3d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) ; Monteiro v. Monteiro, 55 So. 3d 686 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Affirmed.