Mancia v. State, 2010 Ark. 247 (Ark. 5/20/2010)

Citation2010 Ark. 247
Decision Date20 May 2010
Docket NumberCR 08-770.
PartiesChristobal Antonio MANCIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Benton County, CR 2007-802, Hon. Tom J. Keith, Judge; Motion to Withdraw as Counsel

Affirmed; Motion Granted.

PER CURIAM.

A judgment and commitment order entered in 2008 reflects that appellant Christobal Antonio Mancia entered a plea of guilty to rape and was sentenced by the court to life imprisonment. Trial counsel filed a notice of appeal and lodged the instant appeal in this court. Counsel has now filed a motion to be relieved and a no-merit brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(j)(1) (2008).1 Our clerk provided appellant with a copy of appellant's brief and motion as required by Rule 4-3(j), and appellant submitted no points for reversal.

Although counsel indicates in his brief that there was no applicable exception to the general rule that there is no right to appeal from a plea of guilty, an appeal may be taken after a guilty plea when it alleges evidentiary errors which arose after the plea and during the sentencing phase. Johnson v. State, 2010 Ark. 63. In this case, the plea was entered without benefit of a plea agreement, and appellant was provided a hearing for sentencing purposes. Counsel asserts that there were no adverse rulings, however, and our review of the record confirms that there were no objections to the evidence presented to the court. See Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(i) (2009). Consequentially, there were no adverse rulings so as to merit an appeal.

As we agree that an appeal is without merit, we affirm the judgment. Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

Affirmed; motion granted.

1. The appeal here was lodged in 2008, although counsel did not file the brief or motion to withdraw until 2009. Rule 4-3 has been amended and the provisions of then Rule 4-3(j) are now found in subsection (k) of Rule 4-3. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-3 (2010).

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Mancia v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 19, 2015
    ...See Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 4–3(i) (2009). Consequentially, there were no adverse rulings so as to merit an appeal.Mancia v. State, 2010 Ark. 247, at 1, 2010 WL 2006586 (per curiam).On July 19, 2010, pursuant to Rule 37.1 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure (2010), Mancia filed a petition f......
  • Mancia v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 6, 2014
    ...filed a brief on appeal asserting that there was no meritorious basis for his appeal. We agreed and affirmed Mancia's conviction. Mancia v. State, 2010 Ark. 247 (per curiam). On July 19, 2010, pursuant to Rule 37.1 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure (2010), Mancia filed a petition ......
  • Mancia v. State, CR-11-556
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • May 8, 2014
    ...basis for Mancia's appeal. That appeal was docketed as case number CR-08-770. This court agreed and affirmed Mancia's conviction. Mancia v. State, 2010 Ark. 247 (per curiam). The mandate issued on June 8, 2010, and the records in our clerk's office indicate that attorney Dana Reece checked ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT