Mancia v. State, CR-11-556

Decision Date08 May 2014
Docket NumberNo. CR-11-556,CR-11-556
PartiesCRISTOBAL MANCIA APPELLANT v. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

APPEAL FROM THE BENTON

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. CR2007-807-1]

HONORABLE ROBIN F. GREEN,

JUDGE

APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME GRANTED;

ORDER TO RETURN RECORD

ISSUED.

PER CURIAM

This is an appeal from an order entered by the Benton County Circuit Court denying Appellant Cristobal Mancia's petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1. Mancia has filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief, asserting that his prior counsel is in possession of his trial record; therefore, he cannot complete his briefing obligation.

On March 7, 2008, Mancia pled guilty to rape and was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment. Pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(k), attorney Bruce Bennett filed a brief asserting that there was no meritorious basis for Mancia's appeal. That appeal was docketed as case number CR-08-770. This court agreed and affirmed Mancia's conviction. Mancia v. State, 2010 Ark. 247 (per curiam). The mandate issued on June 8, 2010, and the records in our clerk's office indicate that attorney Dana Reece checked out the record in CR-08-770 on July 9, 2010.

On July 19, 2010, pursuant to Rule 37.1 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure, Mancia filed a petition for postconviction relief. The circuit court denied that petition on February 7, 2011. Reece lodged an appeal from that decision on behalf of Mancia, which was docketed as case number CR-11-556. Mancia's brief, after a final extension, was due on August 25, 2011. On October 5, 2011, the State filed a motion to dismiss because no brief had been filed. This court granted the State's motion on October 27, 2011. Upon receiving the order of dismissal, Mancia filed a motion to reconsider dismissal and reinstate appeal on November 4, 2011. After finding that Reece was at fault for failing to file the brief, this court granted Mancia's motion. Mancia v. State, 2011 Ark. 507 (2011) (per curiam). On December 1, 2011, Reece filed a brief on Mancia's behalf.

Thereafter, on April 24, 2012, the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct suspended Reece for thirty-six months from representing clients before the Arkansas Supreme Court and Arkansas Court of Appeals.

On February 6, 2014, we ordered rebriefing in CR-11-556 because of abstract deficiencies in the brief that had been filed by Reece. Mancia v. State, 2014 Ark. 55 (per curiam). Specifically, we noted that "Mancia's guilty-plea hearing is pertinent to the court's review of his Rule 37 appeal" and should be abstracted. Id. at 2.

On March 13, 2014, attorney Craig Lambert filed a motion to be substituted as counsel. We...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Mancia v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 19, 2015
    ...petition.On May 31, 2011, Mancia's attorney, Dana Reece, lodged an appeal from that decision on behalf of Mancia. Mancia v. State, 2014 Ark. 206, 2014 WL 1856744(per curiam). Mancia's brief, after a final extension, was due on August 25, 2011. Id. On October 5, 2011, the State filed a motio......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT