Manning v. Alexander, 89-1774

Decision Date11 April 1990
Docket NumberNo. 89-1774,89-1774
Citation50 Ohio St.3d 127,553 N.E.2d 264
PartiesMANNING, Appellant, v. ALEXANDER, Supt., Appellee.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Madison County, No. CA89-05-006.

Paul R. Manning, pro se.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed based on our decision in In re Petition of Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 222, 551 N.E.2d 954, in which we held that appeal to this court pursuant to Section 2(B)(2)(a)(iii) of Article IV of the Ohio Constitution is an adequate remedy at law to pursue a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and that such actions may not be maintained in habeas corpus.

MOYER, C.J., and SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, HERBERT R. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Lopez v. Wilson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 15 Enero 2004
    ...adequacy of appellate counsel to be proper in a state habeas proceeding. See Manning, 912 F.2d at 882 (citing Manning v. Alexander, 50 Ohio St.3d 127, 553 N.E.2d 264 (Ohio1990); In re: Petition of Brown, 49 Ohio St.3d 222, 551 N.E.2d 954 (1990)). Furthermore, Murnahan emphatically holds tha......
  • Lopez v. Wilson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 7 Octubre 2005
    ...adequacy of appellate counsel to be proper in a state habeas proceeding. See Manning, 912 F.2d at 882 (citing Manning v. Alexander, 50 Ohio St.3d 127, 553 N.E.2d 264 (Ohio 1990); In re: Petition of Brown, 49 Ohio St.3d 222, 551 N.E.2d 954 (1990)). Furthermore, Murnahan emphatically holds th......
  • Manning v. Alexander
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 31 Agosto 1990
    ...Subsequently, Manning filed a state habeas corpus petition resulting in the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in Manning v. Alexander, 50 Ohio St.3d 127, 553 N.E.2d 264 (1990), where it held that claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel could not be raised in a state habeas corpus ......
  • State v. Murnahan
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • 19 Febrero 1992
    ...IV of the Ohio C onstitution. (In re Petition of Brown [1990], 49 Ohio St.3d 222, 223, 551 N.E. 2d 954, 955; Manning v. Alexander [1990], 50 Ohio St.3d 127, 553 N.E.2d 264, f 3. Where the time period for reconsideration in the court of appeals and direct appeal to the Supreme Court has expi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT