Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. Bowker

Decision Date10 May 1983
Citation463 N.Y.S.2d 441,59 N.Y.2d 739
Parties, 450 N.E.2d 247 MARINE MIDLAND BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, v. Edward T. BOWKER, Appellant, v. John F. BYRNE, etc., et al., Third-Party Respondents.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in so much of the opinion by Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division as regards the subject matter jurisdiction of County Court (89 A.D.2d 194, 456 N.Y.S.2d 243).

COOKE, C.J., and JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS, JJ., concur.

FUCHSBERG, J., took no part.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Fogal v. Steinfeld
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • 24 de outubro de 1994
    ...... which can be raised at any time, even at the appeal [Marine Midland Bank v. Bowker, 89 A.D.2d 194, 195-196, 456 ......
  • Morrison v. Budget Rent A Car Systems, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • 28 de abril de 1997
    ...(see, Inland Vale Farm Co. v. Stergianopoulos, 65 N.Y.2d 718, 719, n. *, 492 N.Y.S.2d 7, 481 N.E.2d 547). 243, affd. 59 N.Y.2d 739, 463 N.Y.S.2d 441, 450 N.E.2d 247; Matter of Byrnes v. County of Monroe, 122 A.D.2d 549, 505 N.Y.S.2d 473). Accordingly, courts have been held to lack subject m......
  • Berger v. Medtronic, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • 19 de janeiro de 1995
    ...Thomas v. Best, 104 A.D.2d 37, 482 N.Y.S.2d 368; Marine Midland Bank v. Bowker, 89 A.D.2d 194, 456 N.Y.S.2d 243, affd. 59 N.Y.2d 739, 463 N.Y.S.2d 441, 450 N.E.2d 247; Lacks v. Lacks, 41 N.Y.2d 71, 390 N.Y.S.2d 875, 359 N.E.2d 384; Gomez v. Gomez, 86 A.D.2d 594, 446 N.Y.S.2d 127; affd. 56 N......
  • Mosley v. 137th St. Props., LLC
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • 17 de maio de 2012
    ...on the merits. Maitland v. Troian Elec. & Mach. Co.. 65 N.Y.2d 614, 615-16 (1985). See Strange v. Montefiore Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 59 N.Y.2d at 739; Teiada v. 750 Gerard Props. Corp., 272 A.D.2d 124, 125 (1st Dep't 2000). Since the dismissal of the prior action was not on the merits, res judic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT