Marriage of Agner, In re
| Decision Date | 30 December 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 82CA0292,82CA0292 |
| Citation | 659 P.2d 53 |
| Parties | In re the MARRIAGE OF Lynda D. AGNER, f/k/a Lynda D. Brack, Appellant, and David J. Brack, Appellee. . II |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
William H. Ball, Denver, for appellant.
No appearance for appellee.
Lynda D. Agner appeals from an order of the district court which changed the custody of two minor daughters to their father, David J. Brack. We affirm.
After the dissolution of the parties' marriage in 1975, Agner was awarded custody of the parties' two minor daughters, ages 6 and 2 1/2. Brack was allowed visitation rights which included overnight visits.
In August 1980, the children did not return to Agner after a stay with Brack. At that time, Brack filed for, and was granted, a temporary restraining order enjoining the removal of the two children from his physical custody.
Subsequently, Brack filed motions for temporary custody and for modification of custody. The foregoing motions alleged, inter alia, sexual abuse of the two girls by Agner's husband.
In September of 1980, a hearing was held on Brack's motion to continue the restraining order, and on Agner's motion for change of venue to La Plata County where she and several witnesses lived. The change of venue was denied, and, after testimony and an in camera interview with the two girls, without counsel or the parties present, the court ordered that the temporary restraining order be continued. At that time, Agner objected to the interview and the trial court's order that the transcript of the interview be sealed.
In December of 1981, after hearing testimony of the parties and several expert witnesses, Brack was granted custody of the two girls.
Agner first contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion for change of venue. We disagree.
Agner's motion seeking a change of venue relied upon C.R.C.P. 98(f)(2) which allows for change of venue, "when the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change." A motion based on the foregoing is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, whose decision will be accepted as final on review unless an abuse of discretion is apparent. Evans v. District Court, 194 Colo. 299, 572 P.2d 811 (1977). We find no abuse here.
Agner also assigns as error the trial court's denial of her requested continuance of the December 1981 custody hearing. We find no error.
A request for continuance of a hearing date is a matter which lies peculiarly within the sound discretion of the trial court, and unless there has been an abuse of discretion, a reviewing court may not reverse the trial court's determination. People in Interest of V.A.E.Y.H.D., 199 Colo. 148, 605 P.2d 916 (1980). Again, we find no abuse of discretion.
Agner also contends that the trial court erred in not ordering a social services report from La Plata County, the county where the girls resided for some five years prior to this action. We disagree.
The trial court did order and receive an investigation report from Jefferson County Department of Social Services concerning custodial recommendations for the children. This action met the requirements of § 14-10-127, C.R.S.1973. It contained information concerning and analyzing the situation in both Jefferson and La Plata counties. The report received was thorough and complete. While a separate report from the La Plata Department of Social Services might have been desirable, it was neither required, nor was it an abuse of discretion not to order one. Therefore, we find no error.
Agner also contends that the court erred by failing to determine whether the alleged molestation did in fact occur. We disagree.
Section 14-10-131(2), C.R.S.1973, provides that a custody decree may be modified if "the child's present environment endangers his physical health or significantly impairs his emotional development ...." The best interest and welfare of the children is the primary and controlling consideration of the court. See Aylor v. Aylor, 173 Colo. 294, 478 P.2d 302 (1970). Further, questions of custody must of necessity rest upon the judgment of the trier of fact, and its determination will not be disturbed if there is evidence to support this conclusion. In re Marriage of Trouth, 631 P.2d 1183 (C...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Marriage of Francis, In re
... ... Since we are affording the custodial parent a presumption that the child's best interests are served by remaining with that parent, we decline to incorporate that portion of the Murphy test at this stage of the trial court's inquiry ... 9 See, e.g., In re Marriage of Agner, 659 P.2d 53, 55 (Colo.App.1982) (endangerment found where record revealed abundant evidence that children feared mother's new husband would sexually molest them); In re Custody of Sussenbach, 108 Ill.2d 489, 92 Ill.Dec. 556, 559-60, 485 N.E.2d 367, 370-71 (1985) (among other factors, stepfather's ... ...
-
In re Marriage of McCaulley-Elfert
... ... See In re Marriage of Laughlin, 932 P.2d 858 (Colo.App.1997)(trial court's determination as to the credibility of witnesses and the sufficiency and weight of the evidence cannot be disturbed on appeal unless it is manifestly erroneous); In re Marriage of Agner, 659 P.2d 53 (Colo.App.1982)(finding of endangerment supported by abundant evidence that, regardless of whether they were actually molested, the children feared such would occur if they were returned to the mother and stepfather's home) ... Furthermore, while 14-10-124(1.5)(a)(IX) and (b)(IV) do ... ...
-
Marriage of Utzinger, In re, 85CA0866
... ... However, in light of the evidence of sexual abuse in the record, we cannot say that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering the change of custody. See Dockum v. Dockum, 34 Colo.App. 98, 522 P.2d 744 (1974). See also In re Marriage of Agner, 659 P.2d 53 (Colo.App.1982); In re Marriage of Trouth, supra ... Finally, we address the mother's assertion that the court erred in not considering certain letters which she attached to her motion for reconsideration and to her notice of appeal in this court. These documents ... ...
-
The Child's Wishes in Apr Proceedings: an Evidentiary Conundrum
...for legislative action concerning admissibility of child hearsay in child sexual abuse cases). 13. CRS § 14-10-126(1). 14. In re Agner, 659 P.2d 53 (Colo.App. 15. In re Marriage of Davis, 602 P.2d 904 (Colo.App. 1979). 16. In re Custody of C.J.S., 37 P.3d 479 (Colo.App. 2001). 17. CRS § 14-......