Marshall v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 19 January 1934 |
Docket Number | 13759. |
Parties | MARSHALL v. KANSAS CITY LIFE INS. CO. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Lancaster County; W. H Townsend, Judge.
Action by W. B. Marshall against the Kansas City Life Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Benet Shand & McGowan, of Columbia, for appellant.
Gregory & Gregory, of Lancaster, for respondent.
This action by W. B. Marshall, as plaintiff, against Kansas City Life Insurance Company, defendant, commenced in the court of common pleas for Lancaster county, September, 1932, is a suit to recover under the disability provisions of a policy of life insurance issued by the defendant. Issues being joined the case was tried at the March, 1933, term of said court before Hon. W. H. Townsend, circuit judge, and a jury resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff for the amount involved. From judgment entered on the verdict the defendant has appealed to this court and asks a reversal of the said judgment upon the grounds stated in the exceptions.
The position of the appellant, as appears from appellant's brief, is that the exceptions raise the following questions:
In answering these questions it is necessary to consider the same in connection with the following provisions in the insurance contract involved:
In response to the allegations of the complaint, the plaintiff offered testimony tending to show, in effect, that subsequent to the issuance of the policy involved, and while the same was in full force and effect, the insured, on or about January 29, 1932, became permanently disabled by reason of injury to his hand, caused from a gunshot wound. In response to questions as to what effect this injury had upon the insured in making a living, the insured testified, in part, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smoak v. Southeastern Life Ins. Co.
... ... In the ... case of Marshall v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co., ... 171 S.C. 321, 172 S.E. 504, 506, the court said: "It is ... ...
-
Thompson v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.
... ... contention of the appellant in the case of Marshall v ... Kansas City Life Insurance Company, 171 S.C. 321, 172 ... S.E. 504, 506, where the court ... ...
-
Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. South
... ... during the remainder of his life.' Plaintiff was unable ... to continue as a switchman on account of such ... Ins. Co. v. Owen (C.C.A.) 31 F. (2d) 862; Marshall ... v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co., 171 S.C. 321, 172 S.E ... ...
-
Mann v. Travelers' Ins. Co.
... ... Berry v ... United Life & Accident Ins. Co., 120 S.C. 328, 113 S.E ... 141; 7 Ann. Cas. 815, ... Jefferson Stand. Life Ins. Co., 171 ... S.C. 123, 171 S.E. 617; Marshall v. Kansas City Life Ins ... Co., 171 S.C. 321, 172 S.E. 504; Dukes v ... ...