Martinez v. State

Decision Date02 October 1961
Docket NumberNo. 33537,33537
Citation350 S.W.2d 929,171 Tex.Crim. 443
PartiesMike MARTINEZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

George T. Thomas, Roger D. Brown, Big Spring, for appellant.

Justin A. Kever, Dist. Atty., San Angelo, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, life.

The indictment, returned November 7, 1960, alleged that appellant, on or about May 7, 1957, killed Taylor L. Garrett by shooting him with a gun.

Trial was upon a plea of guilty, appellant having filed application for suspended sentence.

The evidence introduced by the state included the following:

The deceased, Taylor Garrett, was employed at a Gulf Service Station in Sterling City. About 9 P.M. the witness Gruny, who operated a service station across the street, saw an automobile which he described as a "51 Ford' at the Gulf Station and saw the deceased and some boys there. He heard some shots and saw the car pulling out of the driveway at a 'terrific speed', going toward San Angelo. He saw the deceased staggering across the driveway hollering 'Boots, Boots.' He told his son to call the sheriff and he ran to the deceased, arriving just as he fell face down. He was present when the sheriff and deputy sheriff arrived, and when Dr. Swann pronounced Taylor Garrett dead, and the body was removed.

San Angelo Police Officer R. G. McKnight testified that a road block was set up in San Angelo; that a 'light tan '50 Ford' ran the block and he pursued it until it overturned. He identified appellant as one of four young teenagers who were in the car. He testified that appellant was in the front seat, and he identified a pistol introduced in evidence as that which he noticed laying next to the windshield in the upturned car.

Nicky Rocha testified that he was with appellant when they stopped at the service station and he saw appellant shoot Mr. Garrett. He testified that he was with appellant in Big Spring when they went to St. Thomas Church and took the car and some beer, then picked up two boys, Herman and Doyle; that after drinking some of the beer they started toward San Angelo. It was his testimony that he was driving the car and that he stopped at the service station in Sterling City because Herman and the appellant said they wanted to go to the bathroom.

'Herman and Mike (appellant) got out and they went in the bathroom; then Herman started out and Mike then went into the service station, * * * and when I last looked up Mr. Garrett was struggling with Mike.'

Nicky further testified that after the appellant shot Mr. Garrett they 'took off * * * and headed for San Angelo;' that he drove at about 90 miles per hour; that appellant 'was kind of scared and drunk'; that they drove through a road block and finally turned the car over.

On cross-examination he testified that appellant had the pistol when they were walking from school; that some of the boys shot at some cans and bottles before they left Big Spring; that appellant wanted them to go to Mexico with him; that he did not hear anybody say anything about holding up the filling station; that after the shooting appellant and Herman got in the car, appellant said 'Let's go,' and Herman said 'You killed him,' and the appellant said 'I didn't mean to.'

The state introduced without objection the voluntary statement of the appellant in which he stated that he, Herman and Nicky 'decided to rob a gas station in Sterling City. We stopped at a Gulf Station * * * Herman and I got out of the car and went into the rest room to see if the gun was loaded, * * * We both went inside the station, I pulled the gun on the man and told him to open the cash register. He grabbed me by the neck and started pulling me outside and was hollowing 'Boots'. When we got outside I shot him first in the leg one time and I got him five times in the stomach. We jumped in the car and Nicky drove 95 and 100 miles an hour, I told him to step on it harder.'

Appellant testified that Herman said they needed some money; that after they used the rest room 'Herman and me stepped in front of the door. * * * we were going to try to scare him to give us the money, and when we saw he didn't get scared * * * Herman ran to the car, and I started to run to the car too when he grabbed me. * * * he started struggling around with me, and I was trying to get away from him, and I figured if I shot the gun * * * he would let me loose, and I started firing, but I didn't--I wasn't pointing the gun at him. * * *'

He denied that he intended to shoot or kill the deceased or that he knew he had killed him, but testified that he kept firing until he was out of shells, 'I didn't know I hit him until he fell down' and didn't know how many times the deceased had been shot until the officers told him.

Appellant was nearing his 14th birthday when Mr. Garrett was killed. The indictment was returned after appellant reached the age of 17 years.

Appellant pleaded guilty, but after hearing the evidence, including the testimony of the appellant, the careful trial judge withdrew the plea of guilty and entered the plea of not guilty.

The court, in his charge, gave effect to Art. 31, P.C., the appellant not having arrived at the age of 17 when the offense was committed, and death was not submitted as an applicable punishment.

Prior to answering ready for trial, appellant filed a plea of former conviction as a bar to prosecution under the murder indictment, alleging that he had been adjudged a juvenile delinquent in the County Court and committed to the 'State Youth Development School for Boys at Gatesville, Texas.' Attached to said motion is the petition alleging Mike Martinez to be a male child 13 years of age and alleging as facts which appeared to bring him within the provisions of the Delinquent Child Act that on or about May 7, 1957, he made an assault upon T. L. Garrett and 'by said assault, and by violence upon the said T. L. Garrett, and by putting the said T. L. Garrett in fear of life and bodily injury, attempt to fraudulently take from the person and possession of the said T. L. Garrett the personal property of the said T. L. Garrett, with the intent then and there to appropriate said property to the use and benefit of him, the said Mike Martinez * * *.'

Also attached to said plea is an order finding Mike Martinez guilty of the acts alleged in the petition; adjudging him a delinquent child and committing him to the custody of the Texas State Youth Development Council for an indefinite time, not extending beyond the time he should reach the age of 21 years, and ordering his delivery to the custody of the State Youth Council by delivering him to Gatesville State School for Boys, Gatesville, Texas.

No evidence appears to have been offered in support of the plea and no issue was submitted to the jury or requested in regard thereto.

The only evidence found in the statement of facts which may be said to relate to the Juvenile proceeding appears in the testimony of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Richardson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 14, 1970
    ...clerk and then assaulted another person in making his escape); People v. Deerman, 169 Cal.App.2d 808, 337 P.2d 853; Martinez v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.App. 443, 350 S.W.2d 929, Ex parte Chapman, 43 Cal.2d 385, 273 P.2d 817 (accused made an assault as part of robbery and subsequently committed a ......
  • White v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • February 7, 1979
    ...eighteen or nineteen years of age, and had matured in appearance, etc. See, e. g., Perry v. State, supra; Martinez v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 443, 350 S.W.2d 929 (1961); Hultin v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 425, 351 S.W.2d 248 (1961); Foster v. State, In Garza v. State, 369 S.W.2d 36 (Tex.Cr.App.196......
  • Ex parte Sawyer
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 16, 1964
    ...was shown to have been committed and it was alleged both in the juvenile proceedings and in the indictment. In Martinez v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.App. 443, 305 S.W.2d 929, the offense alleged in Juvenile Court was assault to rob, whereas the conviction under the indictment was for murder. In Per......
  • Foster v. State, 39160
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 23, 1966
    ...219 S.W.2d 1016; Wood v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 309, 349 S.W.2d 605; Perry v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 282, 350 S.W.2d 21; Martinez v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 443, 350 S.W.2d 929; Hultin v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 425, 351 S.W.2d 248; Lopez v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 552, 352 S.W.2d House Bill 444, enacte......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT