MATTER OF COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK v. REMY KY
| Decision Date | 22 October 2002 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Parties | In the Matter of COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>REMY K.Y., Appellant. |
Contrary to respondent's contention, there is no requirement that the parent receiving child support demonstrate that he or she is primarily supporting the child (see generally Family Ct Act § 413). Assuming, arguendo, that the January 10, 2001 hearing did not examine Ms. W.'s potential to earn income, respondent should have appealed the January 10 order (see generally Matter of Dauria v Dauria, 286 AD2d 879, 880). Similarly, if respondent wished to challenge Ms. W.'s eligibility for welfare, he should have done so at the January 10 hearing. Since he had the opportunity to be heard at that time, he was not deprived of due process (cf. People v David W., 95 NY2d 130, 138). In any event, we note that "[t]he statutes and the regulations * * * place sole authority and responsibility for determining eligibility for public assistance, both original and continuing, upon the Department of Social Services" (Matter of Walker v Buscaglia, 71 AD2d 315, 320).
Respondent's argument that his petition for termination of child support should be deemed to include a request for downward modification of child support is not preserved for appellate review (see e.g. Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. [Wandel] v Segarra, 78 NY2d 220, 222 n 1).
Respondent concedes that Family Court Act § 262 (a) does not provide indigent litigants with assigned counsel in article 4 support proceedings, but contends that the statute's failure to so provide is constitutionally infirm. The presumption, however, is that the right to assigned counsel exists "only when, if [the indigent litigant] loses, he may be deprived of his physical liberty" (Lassiter v Department of Social Servs., 452 US 18, 27). Although this presumption is rebuttable (id. at 27, 31), respondent has not made the necessary showing. Unlike Lassiter, which involved the important private interest implicated in a proceeding to terminate parental rights, respondent's interest in decreasing his child support payments is not sufficiently important to support a constitutional mandate that assigned counsel be provided. Respondent's financial interests are protected by Family Court Act § 413 (1) (d). As for his equal protection argument, he fails to show the existence of a suspect classification.
Finally,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Brinson v. Brinson
...Dept. 2012], lv denied 19 N.Y.3d 807, 2012 WL 2401528 [2012] ; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N.Y. v. Remy K.Y. , 298 A.D.2d 261, 262, 748 N.Y.S.2d 732 [1st Dept. 2002] ; see generally Matter of Kissel v. Kissel , 59 A.D.2d 1036, 1036, 399 N.Y.S.2d 781 [4th Dept. 1977] )......
-
In the Matter of Niagara County Dep't of Soc. Serv. v. Hueber
...to be heard at that time, he was not deprived of due process” ( Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N.Y. v. Remy K.Y., 298 A.D.2d 261, 262, 748 N.Y.S.2d 732). In any event, petitioner presented documentary evidence that the custodian and the child received public assistance d......
-
Leonardo v. Leonardo
...support modification proceeding ( see Family Ct. Act § 262[a]; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N.Y. v. Remy K.Y., 298 A.D.2d 261, 262, 748 N.Y.S.2d 732). The father's contention [942 N.Y.S.2d 730] therefore may not be considered absent extraordinary circumstances, which a......
-
Charity Akosua A. v. Nana A., 15855.
...18 N.Y.S.3d 373right to assigned counsel in a support proceeding (Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N.Y. v. Remy K.Y., 298 A.D.2d 261, 262, 748 N.Y.S.2d 732 [1st Dept.2002] ).The presumption of legitimacy was rebutted by clear and convincing evidence of respondent's paterni......