MATTER OF COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES, SUFFOLK COUNTY DSS v. Connolly
| Decision Date | 31 March 2003 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Parties | In the Matter of COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES, SUFFOLK COUNTY DSS, on Behalf of DAWN MOLINARI, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>PAUL CONNOLLY, Appellant. |
Ordered that on the court's own motion, the appellant's notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted (see CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellant seeks to apply the doctrine of equitable estoppel to support his claim that it would be inequitable to him and contrary to the best interests of the child to allow the mother to assert a claim of paternity 14 years after the child was born. However, the Family Court properly refused to apply the doctrine of equitable estoppel and that determination is in the best interests of the child (see Matter of Haynes v Martin, 281 AD2d 480 [2001]; Jean Maby H. v Joseph H., 246 AD2d 282, 285 [1998]; Matter of Ettore I. v Angela D., 127 AD2d 6 [1987]). The child never considered his mother's former husband to be his father, nor did he have any ongoing relationship with him. Moreover, the child was aware that the appellant was his father from an early age. Accordingly, the order of filiation was properly entered.
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Onorina C.T. v. Ricardo R.E.
...925 N.Y.S.2d 871 ; Matter of Ruby M.M. v. Moses K. , 18 A.D.3d 471, 472, 795 N.Y.S.2d 73 ; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs., Suffolk County DSS v. Connolly , 303 A.D.2d 754, 756 N.Y.S.2d 866 ). As relevant here, the doctrine "is a defense in a paternity proceeding which, among other ......
-
Suffolk Cnty. Dep't of Soc. Servs. ex rel. Christopher C. v. James D.
...73 ; see Matter of Marilene S. v. David H., 85 A.D.3d at 1036, 925 N.Y.S.2d 871 ; see also Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs., Suffolk County DSS v. Connolly, 303 A.D.2d 754, 756 N.Y.S.2d 866 ). "[W]hether it is being used in the offensive posture to enforce rights or the defensive pos......
- MATTER OF JENKINS v. Strough