Maxwell v. Mayor & Aldermen of the City of Savannah
Decision Date | 05 June 1997 |
Docket Number | Nos. A97A0316,A97A0317,s. A97A0316 |
Citation | 487 S.E.2d 478,226 Ga.App. 705 |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Parties | , 97 FCDR 2195 MAXWELL v. MAYOR & ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF SAVANNAH et al. GELLATLY v. MAXWELL. |
Novit, Scarminach & Williams, Dale E. Akins, Billy E. Moore, Hilton Head Island, SC, for appellant Maxwell.
Oliver, Maner & Gray, Patrick T. O'Connor, David S. Gruskin, Savannah, for appellant Gellatly.
Wiseman, Blackburn & Futrell, James B. Blackburn, Abda L. Quillian, Savannah, for appellees Mayor & Aldermen of the City of Savannah.
James Maxwell, a former police officer for the City of Savannah ("the City"), sued, among others, the Mayor and Aldermen as the City's governing body, and the City's Chief of Police, David Gellatly. In his complaint, Maxwell alleged, inter alia, that the defendants wrongfully terminated him from his employment as a police officer and that Gellatly defamed him in connection with the termination. Maxwell alleged that these actions constituted violations of his due process rights to property and liberty under 42 USC § 1983 and state law. These appeals follow the trial court's order disposing of the defendants' motion for summary judgment. In Case No. A97A0316, Maxwell appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment against him on his § 1983 claims, and in Case No. A97A0317, Gellatly appeals the trial court's denial of his motion on Maxwell's defamation claim. For reasons which follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part the trial court's judgment in Case No. A97A0316, and we affirm the trial court in Case No. A97A0317.
(Emphasis in original.) Lau's Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491, 405 S.E.2d 474 (1991).
Viewed in a light most favorable to Maxwell, as the respondent to the defendants' motion, the record shows that in 1992 Maxwell was the subject of a federal investigation involving illegal drug activity. Maxwell was subsequently charged in a criminal indictment with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance. Following Maxwell's arrest, Gellatly immediately terminated his employment with the police department.
The termination notice, which Gellatly issued to Maxwell on May 22, 1992, provided that "[e]ffective 5-26-92, your employment with the City of Savannah is terminated for ... '[c]onduct unbecoming of an officer.' " The notice further provided that "[w]ithin 24 hours following suspension prior to dismissal, you may respond in a written appeal to the superior of the supervisor who initiated the termination action if you feel the action is unjustified." Finally, the notice informed Maxwell that he had a right to initiate an appeal to the Civil Service Board by filing a notice of appeal within ten days from his receipt of the termination notice. Despite these appeal provisions, and others contained in an employee handbook and the department's Standard Operating Procedures, Maxwell did not appeal his termination. A subsequent trial on the charges against Maxwell resulted in a mistrial, and the indictment was eventually dismissed with prejudice.
In the instant complaint, Maxwell alleged that his termination was in violation of the City's employee handbook and Standard Operating Procedures which were provided to him during his employment. A page from the employee handbook attached to Maxwell's affidavit provides that The Standard Operating Procedures attached to Maxwell's affidavit provide that Maxwell contends that because he could be terminated only "for cause," he had a protected property interest in continued employment which could not be terminated without due process. In granting the defendants summary judgment, the trial court found that because "[t]here is no statement in any of the documents produced that an employee of the police department may only be fired 'for cause[,]' " they did "not confer upon [Maxwell] a legitimate claim of entitlement to continued employment with the police department." (Emphasis in original.)
1. Maxwell asserts that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on his § 1983 property claim because he had a property interest in continued employment and because it is an "essential principal of due process that such a property right shall not be impinged without affording notice and appropriate hearing prior to discharge." Although we agree with Maxwell that the trial court erred in concluding that he did not have a protected property interest in continued employment, we nevertheless affirm the decision because Police Chief Gellatly is entitled to qualified immunity against this claim and there is no evidence establishing the City's liability.
42 USC § 1983 provides a cause of action to an individual who has been deprived of a property right by a government official without due process. See 42 USC § 1983; Atlanta City School Dist. v. Dowling, 266 Ga. 217, 218, 466 S.E.2d 588 (1996). (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Peterson v. Atlanta Housing Auth., 998 F.2d 904, 914 (11th Cir.1993).
The defendants in this case have presented no evidence showing that Maxwell was an employee at will. Rather, the only evidence cited shows that Maxwell may be dismissed for "good cause." The trial court's reliance on the fact that the handbook did not state that Maxwell "may only be fired 'for cause' " ignores the rule that on summary judgment the evidence is to be construed in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party. See Lau's Corp., supra. Viewing the handbook provision in this light and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find that Maxwell could be dismissed only for cause. Accordingly, contrary to the trial court's order, we find that Maxwell did have a property interest sufficient to support a claim under 42 USC § 1983. See Peterson, supra.
Despite this finding, however, we conclude that Gellatly was immune from the § 1983 claim in this case. Gellatly's qualified immunity defense is governed by federal law. Forney v. Purvis, 190 Ga.App. 192, 195 (2), 378 S.E.2d 470 (1989). Citing federal law, this Court has recognized that "[g]overnment officials performing discretionary functions are granted a qualified immunity shielding them from imposition of personal liability pursuant to 42 USC § 1983 insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Thomas v. Holt, 221 Ga.App. 345, 347-348(1), 471 S.E.2d 300 (1996). " Id. at 348, 471 S.E.2d 300.
Under a two-part analysis applied by the Eleventh Circuit, a defendant public official asserting immunity must show that Stough v. Gallagher, 967 F.2d 1523, 1526 (11th Cir.1992).
It is clear in this case that Gellatly was acting within the scope of his discretionary authority when he dismissed Maxwell. Gellatly's burden was met "by showing objective circumstances which would compel the conclusion that his actions were undertaken pursuant to the performance of his duties and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ratliff v. McDonald
...in the motion for summary judgment, and thus we cannot decide this appeal on that basis. See Maxwell v. Mayor & Aldermen of the City of Savannah, 226 Ga.App. 705, 711(4), 487 S.E.2d 478 (1997). Accordingly, we must address the merits of Ratliff's claims because those issues were raised on t......
-
Sherin v. Department of Human Resources
...constitutional laws." [Cit.]' Stough v. Gallagher, 967 F.2d 1523, 1526 (11th Cir.1992)." Maxwell v. Mayor, etc., of the City of Savannah, 226 Ga.App. 705, 707-708(1), 487 S.E.2d 478 (1997). This burden requires that the plaintiff demonstrate that the official's actions are so obviously wron......
-
Brewer v. Schacht
...v. City of Plant City, Fla., 871 F.2d 1037, 1042-43 (11th Cir.1989). [Cit.]" (Punctuation omitted.) Maxwell v. Mayor &c. of Savannah, 226 Ga.App. 705, 710(3), 487 S.E.2d 478 (1997). In Rogers, supra at 328(2), 358 S.E.2d 855, this Court applied this rule to a liberty interest claim.4 As the......
-
Smith v. Toys" R" Us, Inc.
...Southern, 185 Ga.App. 79, 363 S.E.2d 291 (1987). 7. Mallory, supra at 429-430, 408 S.E.2d 443. 8. Maxwell v. Mayor, etc., of Savannah, 226 Ga. App. 705, 707(1), 487 S.E.2d 478 (1997). 9. 110 Ga.App. 170, 138 S.E.2d 77 (1964). 10. Colbert v. Piggly Wiggly Southern, 175 Ga.App. 44, 45(1), 332......
-
Local Government Law - R. Perry Sentell, Jr.
...courts, see R. Perry Sentell, Jr., Local Government and Constitutional Torts: In the Georgia Courts, 49 Mercer L. Rev. 1 (1997). 149. 226 Ga. App. 705, 487 S.E.2d 478 (1997). 150. Id. at 705, 487 S.E.2d at 480. Plaintiff had been arrested and charged with drug trafficking, and the police ch......
-
Labor and Employment Law - W. Melvin Haas Iii, William M. Clifton Iii, and W. Jonathan Martin Ii
...1989)). 162. Id. (citing Dixon v. MARTA, 242 Ga. App. 262, 529 S.E.2d 398 (2000)). 163. Id. (citing Maxwell v. Mayor & City of Savannah, 226 Ga. App. 705, 478 S.E.2d 478 (1997)). 164. Id. 165. Id. Specifically the court observed, the 1992 manual allows disciplinary action against employees ......