McAbee v. State, 80-749

Decision Date19 December 1980
Docket NumberNo. 80-749,80-749
Citation391 So.2d 373
PartiesRobert Lee McABEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael J. Kotler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

DANAHY, Judge.

Robert Lee McAbee argues that his conviction for attempted resisting arrest with violence is void because there is no such crime in this state. We agree and reverse.

Appellant was charged with resisting arrest with violence in violation of section 843.01, Florida Statutes (1979), and subsequently found guilty of attempted resisting arrest with violence. Section 843.01 provides:

Whoever knowingly and willfully resists, obstructs, or opposes any ... municipal police officer ... in the lawful execution of any legal duty, by offering or doing violence to the person of such officer ... is guilty of a felony of the third degree .... (Emphasis supplied.)

We believe that the legislature's use of the word "offering" in this statute is equivalent to the use of the word "attempting." See Black's Law Dictionary 1233 (4th ed. 1951). When the definition of the major offense charged includes the attempt to commit that act, there can be no separate crime of attempt. Miles v. State, 374 So.2d 1167 (Fla.2d DCA 1979), and State v. Thomas, 362 So.2d 1348 (Fla.1978).

Although at trial appellant failed to object to the instruction and charge given on attempted resisting arrest with violence, he is nonetheless entitled to raise his point on appeal because it constitutes "fundamental error." Fundamental error is defined as error which goes to the foundation of the case or goes to the merits of the cause of action. Vogel v. State, 365 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). That doctrine applies to the case at bar because there is no such crime as attempted resisting arrest with violence.

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment and sentence, and direct that McAbee be discharged.

SCHEB, C. J., and RYDER, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • State v. Sykes
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 7 Julio 1983
    ...State, 377 So.2d 1161 (Fla.1979); King v. State, 339 So.2d 172 (Fla.1976), affirming 317 So.2d 852 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); McAbee v. State, 391 So.2d 373 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Silvestri v. State, 332 So.2d 351 (Fla. 4th DCA), approved, 340 So.2d 928 By defining the crimes of theft and grand thef......
  • Keel v. State, AP-10
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 23 Junio 1983
    ...4th DCA 1978), in which section 918.14, Florida Statutes, relating to tampering with evidence, was considered; and McAbee v. State, 391 So.2d 373 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) involving section 843.01, Florida Statutes, the statute involving resisting an officer with violence. We agree with appellant ......
  • State v. Tousignant, 84-1872
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 28 Noviembre 1984
    ...persuaded that there is no separate offense of attempted obstruction or opposing a police officer by analogy to McABEE V. STATE, 391 So.2d 373 (2d DCA-Fla. 1980). [sic] as is this We find the circuit court erred in two respects. First, contrary to the circuit court's belief, the trial court......
  • Jordan v. State, 81-1199
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 11 Junio 1982
    ...adjudicated guilty of that offense by the court. Thereafter, the trial judge apparently became aware of our holding in McAbee v. State, 391 So.2d 373 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). In McAbee, we held that the crime of attempted resisting arrest with violence does not exist in Florida and therefore def......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT