McCabe v. Director of Revenue
| Decision Date | 05 October 1999 |
| Citation | 7 S.W.3d 12 |
| Parties | (Mo.App. E.D. 1999) . Kevin James McCabe, Respondent, v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Appellant. Case Number: 75430 and 75436 Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Handdown Date: |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Robert S. Cohen
Counsel for Appellant: Evan J. Buchheim
Counsel for Respondent: Kevin R. Kelly
Opinion Summary: The Director of Revenue appeals from the judgment reinstating Kevin McCabe's driving privileges.
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Division Four holds: The court's findings that the officer did not have probable cause to arrest McCabe for driving while intoxicated and that McCabe refused to submit to a breath test were against the weight of the evidence and not supported by substantial evidence.
Opinion Vote: REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS. Karohl and Hoff, JJ., concur.
The Director of Revenue (Director) appeals from the judgment reinstating Kevin McCabe's driving privileges. We reverse and remand.
On September 25, 1997, a St. Louis County police officer arrested McCabe for driving while intoxicated. According to the officer, McCabe refused to submit to a breath test. Director notified McCabe that pursuant to section 577.041 RSMO Cum. Supp. 1997, his driving privileges would be revoked for one year for refusing to submit to a breath test. McCabe filed a petition for review of the revocation in St. Louis County Circuit Court.
At trial, Director offered an exhibit that included in part an Alcohol Influence Report signed by the arresting officer.1 McCabe objected to a portion of the report. The commissioner took the objection under advisement. Director offered no additional evidence and McCabe offered no evidence. The commissioner found that the arresting officer did not see McCabe operating the motor vehicle and did not have probable cause to arrest McCabe. The commissioner also found that McCabe did not refuse to take the breath test. The commissioner recommended that the circuit court reinstate McCabe's driving privileges. The circuit court signed the commissioner's findings and recommendations as the judgment of the court. Director appeals from this judgment.
The judgment will be affirmed unless there is no substantial evidence to support it, it is against the weight of the evidence, or it erroneously declares or applies the law. Tharp v. Director of Revenue, 969 S.W.2d 330, 331 (Mo. App. E.D. 1998). In a proceeding where a person's license has been revoked for refusal to submit to a breath test, the trial court shall determine (1) whether the person was arrested, (2) whether the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to believe that the person was driving a motor vehicle while in an intoxicated condition, and (3) whether or not the person refused to submit to the test. Section 577.041.4 RSMO Cum. Supp. 1997; Harder v. Director of Revenue, 969 S.W.2d 340, 341 (Mo. App. E.D. 1998).
The parties do not dispute that the officer arrested McCabe. We first address the court's finding that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to arrest McCabe for driving while intoxicated. Attached to the Alcohol Influence Report is a page titled "NARRATIVE INFORMATION." A part of the "NARRATIVE INFORMATION" provides certain statements by the arresting officer regarding the circumstances prior to McCabe's arrest. The arresting officer states:
I responded to a call to meet an off duty officer . . . who stated that while traveling south on Bellefontaine, he observed a 1996 Jeep Cherokee, black in color occupied by one white male, to be swerving back and forth across the center line.
[The off duty officer] further stated that at the intersection of Bellefontaine and Larimore he passed the black Cherokee on the left and continued south on Bellefontaine . . ..
The driver of the black Cherokee later identified as Kevin McCabe, then accelerated and got directly behind [the off duty officer]. Due to the erratic driving of Kevin McCabe, [the off duty officer] pulled to the right and stopped on the shoulder of Bellefontaine at the intersection of Dunn, in an effort to allow Kevin to pass. Kevin then came to an abrupt stop directly behind [the off duty officer] and stated [an obscenity.] [The off duty officer] then ordered Kevin to pull his vehicle to the curb, to which he complied. Kevin exited his vehicle and then began to yell obscenities . . ..
[The off duty officer] advised me that he believed due to the subject[']s driving that he was under the influence of alcohol.
The arresting officer also states in the "NARRATIVE...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. Atwell
...vehicle and observes indicia of intoxication upon coming into contact with the motorist") (citation omitted); McCabe v. Director of Revenue, 7 S.W.3d 12, 14 (Mo.App. 1999) (finding probable caused based on defendant's erratic driving, the odor of alcohol on his breath, and his refusal to su......
-
Howdeshell v. Director of Revenue
...of Revenue, 71 S.W.3d 686, 687 (Mo.App.2002); Lyons v. Director of Revenue, 36 S.W.3d 409, 411 (Mo.App. 2001); McCabe v. Director of Revenue, 7 S.W.3d 12, 14 (Mo.App.1999). On appeal, the Director and Howdeshell agree that Exhibit 1 contained sufficient facts to prove that Howdeshell was ar......
-
Spry v. Director of Revenue, State of Mo.
...of Revenue, 92 S.W.3d 218, 221 (Mo.App.2002); Rain v. Director of Revenue, 46 S.W.3d 584, 588 (Mo.App.2001); McCabe v. Director of Revenue, 7 S.W.3d 12, 14 (Mo.App.1999); State v. Cole, 657 S.W.2d 59, 61 ...
-
State v. Ducharme
...intoxicated based upon witness's identification of him as driver and trooper's observations of defendant); McCabe v. Director of Revenue, 7 S.W.3d 12, 13–14 (Mo.Ct.App.1999) (concluding that officer had probable cause to arrest driver for driving while intoxicated because witness informed o......