McClanahan v. Gibson, 87-367
| Decision Date | 19 September 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 87-367,87-367 |
| Citation | 756 S.W.2d 889,296 Ark. 304 |
| Parties | Lisa McCLANAHAN, Appellant, v. L.D. GIBSON, Appellee, |
| Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
John V. Phelps, Jonesboro, for appellant.
This appeal is from a judgment for the appellee, L.D. Gibson, on his tort claim against the appellant, Lisa McClanahan, for property damage totaling $1,029.33. McClanahan argues that the trial court erred in denying her request for a trial by jury. We agree and reverse.
In her answer to the complaint filed by Gibson, McClanahan denied liability and requested a jury trial. The case was set accordingly. Upon discovering that the suit was for $1,029.33, the trial judge reset the case for trial by the court. During the course of pretrial proceedings, and on the day of trial, McClanahan renewed her request for a trial by jury. The court denied the final request, stating:
[T]he constitutional amendment which gave jurisdiction to the municipal court up to [$3,000.00] gives concurrent jurisdiction both to the circuit court and the municipal court, and if the municipal court can try a lawsuit without a jury, the circuit court should be able to, and, for that reason, the motion is denied for a jury trial.
In relevant part, article 2, section 7 of the Arkansas Constitution provides:
The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate, and shall extend to all cases at law, without regard to the amount in controversy. [Emphasis ours.]
We have held that "the constitutional right to trial by jury does not secure the right in all possible instances but only in those cases that were so triable at common law." Dunn v. Davis, 291 Ark. 492, 725 S.W.2d 853 (1987). The underlying tort action is one of those cases.
While section four, paragraph seven, of Act 431 of 1987 [Ark.Code Ann. § 16-17-704(a)(6) (Supp.1987) ] does provide for the concurrent jurisdiction referred to by the trial court, we find nothing in Act 431 which would suggest an intent by the legislature to abrogate the constitutional right to a trial by jury in tort actions triable in circuit court. To the contrary, section 16-17-703, which deals with appeals from municipal court, clearly demonstrates the legislature's concern that the right secured by article 2, section 7 of the Arkansas Constitution not be diminished:
There shall be no jury trials in municipal court. In order that the right of trial by jury remains inviolate, all appeals from judgment in municipal court shall be de novo to ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
First National Bank of DeWitt v. Cruthis
...trial existed "when our constitution was framed." Jones v. Reed, 267 Ark. 237, 248, 590 S.W.2d 6 (1979). See also McClanahan v. Gibson, 296 Ark. 304, 756 S.W.2d 889 (1988); Dunn v. Davis, 291 Ark. 492, 725 S.W.2d 853 (1987); Colclasure v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co., 290 Ark. 585, 720 S.W.2d ......
-
Craven v. Fulton Sanitation Service, Inc.
...to all cases that were triable by a jury at common law. Hopper v. Garner, 328 Ark. 516, 944 S.W.2d 540 (1997); McClanahan v. Gibson, 296 Ark. 304, 756 S.W.2d 889 (1988). In other words, the constitutional right to trial by jury extends only to the trial of issues of fact in civil and crimin......
-
Hopper v. Garner, 96-1423
...does not secure the right in all possible instances, but only in those cases that were so triable at common law. McClanahan v. Gibson, 296 Ark. 304, 756 S.W.2d 889 (1988); Dunn v. Davis, 291 Ark. 492, 725 S.W.2d 853 (1987). Hence, the relevant inquiry is whether, Garner, as a defendant in a......
-
Cullum v. Aldworth, CASE NO. 4:11CV00831 JMM
...the opportunity for a jury trial. Plaintiff's contention that § 16-17-703 is unconstitutional is without merit. See McClanahan v. Gibson, 296 Ark. 305, 756 S.W.2d 889 (1988) (Ark. Code Ann. § 16- 17-70 does not diminish the right to a trial by jury). ____________ James M. Moody United State......