McCrea v. State, 84-1813

Citation475 So.2d 1357,10 Fla. L. Weekly 2272
Decision Date03 October 1985
Docket NumberNo. 84-1813,84-1813
Parties10 Fla. L. Weekly 2272 Frank Joel McCREA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James N. Powers, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Gary W. Tinsley and Kevin Kitpatrick Carson, Asst. Attys. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is a search and seizure case involving the search of a person arrested as a result of being mistakenly identified as another person for whom the arresting officer had an arrest warrant.

In order to arrest a person named Johns, for whom they had an arrest warrant, law enforcement officers were watching a residence where they believed Johns was living with his girlfriend. A man drove up wearing a baseball cap and sunglasses. The officers arrested the man and the search incidental to his arrest revealed his possession of a controlled substance. It also revealed that the man was not Johns but the appellant, McCrea. McCrea's motion to suppress was denied; he was convicted and appeals. We affirm.

The law enforcement officers had an arrest warrant and, hence, probable cause to arrest Johns. There was evidence to support the trial court's factual finding that the officers reasonably and in good faith mistook McCrea for Johns. Under these circumstances the arrest of McCrea, although based on a mistaken identification, was valid. See Hill v. California, 401 U.S. 797, 91 S.Ct. 1106, 28 L.Ed.2d 484 (1971); Neal v. State, 456 So.2d 897 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), review denied, 461 So.2d 115 (Fla.1985).

Accordingly, the search was valid, the evidence was lawfully seized and the trial court's denial of the motion to suppress is

AFFIRMED.

COBB, C.J., and UPCHURCH and COWART, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • City of Tulsa v. Clifford, S-89-606
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
    • February 23, 1990
    ...Clifford, as a warrant had been issued for his arrest. See State v. Payton, 401 N.W.2d 219, 220 (Iowa App.1986); McCrea v. State, 475 So.2d 1357, 1358 (Fla.App. 5 Dist.1985); Neal v. State, 456 So.2d 897, 898 (Fla.App. 2 Dist.1984); State v. Smith, 102 Wash.2d 449, 688 P.2d 146, 149 (1984);......
  • Melton v. State, 96-3007
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 15, 1997
    ...the state's assertion on appeal that an arrest warrant, in fact, existed for the person thought to be the driver. Cf. McCrea v. State, 475 So.2d 1357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985) (arrest of individual valid, where officer, reasonably and in good faith, mistook person for another that officer had arr......
  • Prince v. State, 4D06-83.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 8, 2006
    ...and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See McCrea v. State, 475 So.2d 1357 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Neal v. State, 456 So.2d 897 (Fla. 2d DCA STONE, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT