McCullough v. McCullough

Decision Date07 February 1994
Docket NumberNo. S93A1286,S93A1286
Citation439 S.E.2d 486,263 Ga. 794
PartiesMcCULLOUGH v. McCULLOUGH.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

John B. Degonia, Covington, for Zachery McCullough.

W.D. Ballard, Billy J. Waters, Ballard, Stephenson & Waters, P.C., Covington, for Rita McCullough.

HUNSTEIN, Justice.

Zachery McCullough filed suit against his former wife, Rita Jones McCullough, seeking specific performance of a contract to convey land. Ms. McCullough answered and filed a counterclaim seeking attorney fees and damages for abusive litigation. After a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment denying the relief sought by Mr. McCullough and awarding Ms. McCullough $2,000 in attorney fees. Mr. McCullough appeals.

Appellant signed a "sales agreement loan assumption" contract, dated March 22, 1991, which provided he would pay appellee $20,000 for her equity in three parcels of land, on one of which was situated the former marital residence. The contract provided that appellee would pay the loan transfer fee, set the closing date on or before April 10, 1991, and expressly provided that time was of the essence. Appellant did not tender the $20,000 on or before April 10 and the closing date was not extended. In June 1991, appellee accepted $18,500 and a promissory note for $1,500 from appellant and transferred the parcel with the marital residence to appellant, but refused to transfer the remaining two parcels. Appellee testified that because she needed $20,000 by April 10 for another transaction, she had offered all three parcels to appellant to induce a quick sale. Appellant acknowledged at trial that had appellee sold him the house and lot for its appraised rate, she would have been entitled to receive $20,000 as her share of the equity in the property under the parties' settlement agreement.

1. We find no error in the trial court's determination that the parties intended the contract to be void if performance was not completed by the closing date. See Dulock v. Shiver, 239 Ga. 604, 238 S.E.2d 397 (1977). Although where time is of the essence in a contract, timely performance may be waived orally or as shown by conduct before or after the closing date, Edwards v. McTyre, 246 Ga. 302(3), 271 S.E.2d 205 (1980), whether such waiver occurred was an issue of fact for the trier of fact. Id. The trial court's finding that appellee did not waive timely performance was supported by some evidence at trial and was not clearly erroneous. OCGA § 9-11-52(a); see generally Covrig v. Miller, 199 Ga.App. 864(1), 406 S.E.2d 239 (1991).

2. The trial court admitted into evidence an unexecuted contract, drafted by appellee's attorney on April 15, 1991, solely on the basis that the document could serve as an indication that one or both parties thought the original contract was over....

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Hallman v. Emory University
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 6, 1997
    ...is by judgment or dismissal on the merits. Betallic, Inc. v. Deavours, 263 Ga. 796, 439 S.E.2d 643 (1994); McCullough v. McCullough, 263 Ga. 794, 439 S.E.2d 486 (1994); Kirsch v. Meredith, supra at 824, 440 S.E.2d 702; Talbert v. Allstate Ins. Co., supra. Such requirement of final terminati......
  • Snyder v. Time Warner, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • December 20, 2001
    ...in a contract, timely performance may be waived ... as shown by conduct before or after the closing date." McCullough v. McCullough, 263 Ga. 794, 795, 439 S.E.2d 486 (1994); see also, Edwards v. McTyre, 246 Ga. 302, 303, 271 S.E.2d 205 (1980) ("conduct either before or after the closing dat......
  • Bollea v. World Championship Wrestling, Inc., No. A04A1743
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 21, 2005
    ...is possible."). And, where the evidence conflicts, the issue of waiver is a factual question for the jury. McCullough v. McCullough, 263 Ga. 794, 795, 439 S.E.2d 486 (1994). As discussed above, there are issues of fact as to whether Bollea approved the outcome at the July 9 event or acquies......
  • Pepperell Trust Co. v. Mountain Heir Financial Corp.
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • March 5, 1998
    ...to Support Action for Malicious Prosecution, 30 A.L.R.4th 572, 583-85 (1984) and cases cited therein. See also McCullough v. McCullough, 263 Ga. 794, 439 S.E.2d 486 (1994); Cox v. Klein, 546 So.2d 120 (Fla.App.1989); Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc. v. McGugin, 530 So.2d 730 (Ala.1988); ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Criminal Law - Frank C. Mills, Iii
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 46-1, September 1994
    • Invalid date
    ...at 289, 444 S.E.2d at 309. 322. 263 Ga. 782, 439 S.E.2d 483 (1994). 323. Id. at 783-84, 439 S.E.2d at 485. 324. Id. 325. Id. at 784, 439 S.E.2d at 486. 326. Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972). 327. Id. at 37. 328. Peters v. State, 210 Ga. App. 211, 213, 435 S.E.2d 731, 733 (1993). 32......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT