McDaniel v. State

Decision Date13 August 1968
Docket NumberNo. 67-1049,67-1049
Citation213 So.2d 505
PartiesSharon McDANIEL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Harold Ungerleider, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

SWANN, Judge.

The appellant appeals from an order finding her guilty of criminal contempt and sentencing her to ninety (90) days in the Dade County jail.

The contempt order was entered against her during a bitterly contested divorce case in which she was a prospective witness who had been subpoenaed to testify at the final hearing. Her testimony would have been relevant and material to the issues therein.

The record reflects competent, substantial evidence to sustain the finding of a direct contempt committed in the immediate presence of the court. See State ex rel. Luban v. Coleman, 138 Fla. 555, 189 So. 713 (1939); Thiede v. State, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 490; In re S.L.T., Fla.App.1965, 180 So.2d 374; and United States v. Appel, 211 F. 495 (S.D.N.Y.1913).

Appellant did not make any claim in the trial court that she was being compelled to testify against herself and no reversible error has been shown in this regard. Hargis v. Fla. Real Estate Commission, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 419.

The record shows that appellant was represented by counsel of her own choice at the hearing and consulted with him prior to its commencement. There was no motion for continuance presented on her behalf during the proceedings. Her claim, therefore, that she was denied effective assistance of counsel is without merit. Coyner v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 715 and Everett v. State, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 714. The order and sentence are

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Chavez-Rey v. Chavez-Rey
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 20, 1968
    ...because the case before us involves a direct contempt, a contemptuous act committed in the presence of the court. Cf. McDaniel v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 505 (opinion filed August 13, 1968). The procedural requirements for prosecuting a direct criminal contempt are set forth in Rule ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT