McFall v. State
| Decision Date | 12 September 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 29975,29975 |
| Citation | 235 Ga. 105,218 S.E.2d 839 |
| Parties | Donald Larry McFALL v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Harvey A. Monroe, Jonesboro, Paul McGee, Atlanta, for appellant.
William H. Ison, Dist. Atty., Clarence L. Leathers, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Jonesboro, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., John W. Dunsmore, Jr., Sraff Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for appellee.
Donald Larry McFall was found guilty on an indictment charging him with forcible rape. He was sentenced by the judge to serve ten years in prison. He appeals to this court.
1. The appellant moved to suppress the certain statements made by him and a Jackson-Denno hearing (378 U.S. 366, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908) was held to determine their voluntariness. The appellant contended at this hearing that he was intoxicated and that his written confession was obtained after he was promised that the State would not charge him with kidnapping.
The record shows that the victim went with the police officers to the appellant's apartment and identified him as her assailant; that he was placed under arrest and informed of his constitutional rights, that he affirmatively indicated that he understood his rights; that the appellant stated to the officers that he wanted the victim to look straight at him and tell him that he raped her; that the victim did, and the appellant started crying and stated, 'I did it . . . I raped her'; and that immediately thereafter, he asked the interrogating officer if it would go easier on him if he told the truth. The officer told him he could make no promises to him but would inform the district attorney that he had been cooperative. He was asked if he would make a written statement about what occurred that night and he said that he would. The officer testified that the appellant had a faint odor of alcohol on him but he was steady on his feet and talked well; that he explained the rape penalty to him and also told him of the kidnapping statute; and that he did not tell him he would not be charged with kidnapping if he signed the statement.
The trial court overruled the motion to suppress the confessions. In Johnson v. State, 233 Ga. 58, 209 S.E.2d 629, this court said: 'Factual and credibility determinations of this sort made by a trial judge after a suppression hearing must be accepted by appellate courts unless such determinations are clearly erroneous,' citing Lego v. Twomey, 404 U.S. 477, 92 S.Ct. 619, 30 L.Ed.2d 618, and United States v. Watson, 5 Cir., 469 F.2d 362. Also High v. State, 233 Ga. 153, 210 S.E.2d 673.
It follows that there is no merit in the argument that the motion to suppress should have been sustained.
2. The appellant contends that the trial court erred in charging the jury at the state's request that when an act of sexual intercourse with a girl under the age of fourteen is shown, the law supplies the essential element of force. The appellant was charged with forcible rape (Code Ann. § 26-2001; Ga.L.1968, pp. 1246, 1299) and not statutory rape (Code Ann. § 26-2018; Ga.L. 1968, pp. 1249, 1302).
The age of the victim was not shown in the indictment. In Echols v. State, 153 Ga. 857, 860, 113 S.E. 170, 171, this court dealt with this same question. There we said: 'It has already been decided by this court that 'upon the trial of an indictment for rape it is competent to show that the female upon whom the crime was alleged to have been committed was under ten years of age, though the indictment contained no such allegation.' McMath v. State, 55 Ga. 303. This case furnishes authority, therefore, for the admission of evidence that the female was unable to consent in a case where the indictment contained no allegation as to age. It would seem to follow necessarily from this ruling that the court is authorized to charge the principle of law that a female under fourteen years of age cannot consent, where the indictment contains no allegation as to age; for surely if evidence can be admitted on the question, the court can charge the jury the law in reference thereto. And see the case of Stephen v. State, 11 Ga. 225, where the indictment charged that the accused then and there 'forcibly and against the her will, feloniously did ravish and carnally know' a named female, and where the indictment contained no allegation as to her age. See also Gosha v. State, 56 Ga. 36, where it was ruled: 'An infant under ten years of age cannot consent to sexual intercourse, and the fact that such is her age is conclusive that the act is done forcibly and against her will. " Also Wright v. State, 184 Ga. 62(4), 190 S.E. 663; Latimer v. State, 188 Ga. 775(1), 4 S.E.2d 631.
The only change which the 1968 Criminal Code made in the rape law of this state as previously defined by statute and case law was to reduce the punishment for statutory rape to one to twenty years. Code Ann. § 26-2018 (Ga.L.1968, pp. 1249, 1302). Therefore, it now becomes incumbent upon the court to instruct the jury to find either statutory rape or forcible rape where both are in issue in order that the appropriate punishment may be imposed. See Robinson v. State, 232 Ga. 123, 128(4), 205 S.E.2d 210. In the instant case we find the failure to so instruct harmless since the appellant was sentenced to ten years imprisonment which penalty can be imposed for either statutory rape or forcible rape.
It follows that the charge was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur, except GUNTER and INGRAM, JJ., who dissent.
In my opinion, several fundamental principles of law have to be ignored in this case to agree with the majority opinion. The indictment charged that the accused 'did have carnal knowledge of (the victim) a female, forcibly and against her will, . . .' The defendant pleaded not guilty to this indictment and ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Collins
...(1937); Houston v. State, 186 Ga. 141(1), 197 S.E. 118 (1938); Smith v. State, 192 Ga. 713(1), 16 S.E.2d 543 (1941); McFall v. State, 235 Ga. 105(2), 218 S.E.2d 839 (1975); Todd, supra, 25 Ga.App. at 411(2), 103 S.E. 496; Ollis v. State, 44 Ga.App. 793(1), 163 S.E. 309 (1932); Vickery v. St......
-
Taylor v. State, A03A1274.
...68 (2003). Therefore, it follows that it was not error for the court to charge the jury accordingly. See also McFall v. State, 235 Ga. 105, 106-107, 218 S.E.2d 839 (1975) (although the indictment contained no allegation as to the age of the victim, "if evidence can be admitted on the questi......
-
Durr v. State
...force and against the will" of the victim. OCGA § 16-6-2. For the first quoted proposition Cooper cited Drake and McFall v. State, 235 Ga. 105, 106, 218 S.E.2d 839 (1975), but Drake had said McFall was wrong because it affirmed a conviction of forcible rape on a jury charge that " 'the law ......
-
Brown v. State
...802 (1980), and in the case of Drake v. State, 239 Ga. 232, 236 S.E.2d 748 (1977), the Supreme Court disapproved McFall v. State, 235 Ga. 105, 218 S.E.2d 839 (1975). The former case makes it clear that statutory rape is not a lesser included offense of forceful rape in a criminal trial. Thi......