McGregor v. State Co.
Decision Date | 12 May 1920 |
Docket Number | 10407. |
Citation | 103 S.E. 84,114 S.C. 48 |
Parties | MCGREGOR v. STATE CO. ET AL. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Richland County; W. H Townsend, Judge.
Action by E. C. McGregor, doing business as McGregor's Drug Store, against the State Company and the Irogen Chemical Company. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
The exception referred to is as follows:
D. W Robinson, of Columbia, for appellant.
Benet Shand & McGowan, of Columbia, for respondents.
Action for libel. Demurrer by the State Company. Order sustaining the demurrer. Appeal by the plaintiff.
The circumstances of the case, apparent from the allegations of the complaint, are these: One of the defendants, the Irogen Chemical Company, was the manufacturer of a patent medicine called Irogen, said to contain "essential elements to red blood corpuscles"; that on March 20, 1918, and on March 24, 1918, there appeared in the State Newspaper an unsigned display print and voluminous advertisement of this medicine, the objectional part of which is thus set out in the complaint:
"Scientists Discover Nation's Secret of Regenerating Blood and Vital Powers.
World's Greatest Authorities Demonstrate Irogen Is True Blood Builder.
Druggists Tell How Irogen Invigorates.
Greatest Strength Builder Known to Medical World.
Supplies Elements Essential to Blood, Steadies Nerves, and Confers Power of Resistance to Disease.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hospital Care Corp. v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co.
...The demurrers to the first cause of action must be sustained under the authority of Hubbard v. Furman University, supra; McGregor v. State Co., 114 S.C. 48, 103 S.E. 84; Oliveros v. Henderson, 116 S.C. 77, 106 S.E. and Duncan v. Record Publishing Co., 145 S.C. 196, 143 S.E. 31. "The fact th......
-
Pierce v. Inter-Ocean Cas. Co.
...the College Conservatory of Music. These were made for the good of the department and in the interest of our patrons." In McGregor v. State Co. et al., 114 S.C. 48 (Syl. 103 S.E. 84, it was held: "To constitute actionable libel of a retail druggist concerning his business, the writing must ......
-
Oliveros v. Henderson
...second causes of action must be sustained; and it is so ordered. In addition to the authorities cited above see also: McGregor v. State Co., 114 S.C. 48, 103 S.E. 84, Starkie on Slander and Libel (Amer. Ed.); Smith Bradstreet Co., 63 S.C. 525, 41 S.E. 763; Kee et al. v. Armstrong, Bird & Co......
-
Galloway v. Cox
...is established by the general consent of men, and the inference must be judged of by the Court in the first instance." McGregor v. State Co., 114 S.C. 48, 103 S.E. 84, 85. further allegation of the complaint is that the publication was 'libelous'; but so much is the statement of a legal con......