McLaughlin v. Louisville Electric Light Co.
Decision Date | 25 November 1896 |
Parties | McLaughlin v. Louisville Electric Light Co. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT, COMMON PLEAS DIVISION.
JUNIUS C. KLEIN FOR APPELLANT.
PHELPS & THUM FOR APPELLEE.
GIBSON & MARSHALL ON SAME SIDE.
O'NEAL, PHELPS & PRYOR OF COUNSEL ON SAME SIDE.
GIBSON & MARSHALL, O'NEAL & PRYOR AND PHELPS & THUM IN PETITION FOR REHEARING.
JUDGE GUFFY DELIVERED THE OPINION OF THE COURT.
It is alleged in the petition in this action that
The defendant filed a demurrer to the petition which was overruled by the court.
The first paragraph of the answer substantially denies all the averments in the petition which show any right to recover.
The second paragraph of the answer is as follows:
The reply of plaintiff traversed the allegations of the answer. The jury found for the defendant, and his petition was dismissed.
Appellant relied on these grounds for new trial, viz:
1st. That the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury as requested by plaintiff in instructions Nos. 1, 2, 3, 8 and 9.
2d. That the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence.
3d. That the court erred in not excusing a juror, William Pryott, for cause, he being a stockholder in the Louisville Gas Co., and it being the owner of the stock in the defendant company.
The motion for new trial was overruled, and plaintiff has appealed.
The plaintiff below (appellant here) testified in substance as follows: "S. T. McLaughlin testified that he was twenty-two years of age, and a house painter by trade; was a contractor in that line, and had the job, in conjunction with Asa Carr, of painting the front of H. C. Green's hotel, known as the Fourth Avenue Hotel, and had almost finished the work on the 8th day of July, 1893, when he came in contact with one of the defendant's electric wires, near the side of a window, and received a shock; that the defendant had two wires running from the west side of Fourth street, in Louisville, Ky.; that these two wires were fastened to brackets attached to the side of the wall between the first and second windows of the hotel, counting from the north; these windows were on the second floor of the building; the first floor was occupied by business firms; that these brackets were fastened to the wall about six inches from each window and about five feet above the sill of the windows; that defendant had an iron box, called a converter, attached to the side of the hotel building, midway between these two windows; that this box was about a foot above an iron cornice, running the full length of the building, immediately below the windows, about six inches below; that these two wires ran from the brackets to the top of this converter or box; that plaintiff was shocked by the wire next to the north side of the second window, at a place where the wire was joined together, and about halfway between the bracket and the converter; that this wire ran down from its bracket along the side of the window, and six inches from the window, for about two feet, and then turned over north to the converter; that the iron cornice was about twelve inches wide, space enough for a man to stand on conveniently and paint; that he and his men had to use this cornice to work from, as there were wires preventing the staging or swinging ladder from being let down between them; when he had painted down to the bracket and wires he pulled the staging up out of the way and painted around the wires and the iron box while standing on the iron cornice; the window sill was outside, about five inches by five inches, and rested on the iron cornice inside of wood, about a foot wide; that he had put several coats of paint on the house, and was through, with the exception of touching up the right hind ear of the iron box; that he was in the act of getting out of this second window on the cornice to touch up this ear when he received the shock; that he had taken his brush full of paint in his right hand, and nothing in his left, and was on the sill of the window, turning back out onto the cornice, when he used his left hand to steady himself against the north side of the window opening, when his hand came in contact with the wire and he received the shock which rendered him unconscious, and he did not know anything more for about a half an hour, when he was revived, and found himself inside of the house, with Asa Carr, W. J. Cody his employe, and Mr. H. C. Green working with him to revive him; that his left hand was burnt and blistered on the third and fourth fingers, and at the edge of the palm at base of small finger; that he suffered a great deal at the time of the shock and long afterward; that he went home and went to bed for a week; that he has never fully recovered the full use of his left arm and hand; that he has not been able to work at his trade or calling on account of the weakness of his hand; that he can not properly handle the brush and ropes; that in his trade it requires strong hands and arms to hoist and lower one's self on the staging; that he has not had any work at his trade at all; that he did and is working as a hand on the steamer ______, plying between Louisville and Cincinnati; has worked about two months; that there was no sign or anything else to warn him of a danger about or near those wires."
On cross-examination said S. T. McLaughlin testified that ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Booker v. Southwest Missouri R. Co.
...Mo. App. 593, 109 S. W. 1065; Brown v. Consolidated Light, Power & Ice Co., 137 Mo. App. 718, 109 S. W. 1032; McLaughlin v. Light Co., 100 Ky. 173, 37 S. W. 851, 34 L. R. A. 812. But in this case, the petition, the evidence, and the instructions do not proceed upon the doctrine of res ipsa ......
-
Harrison v. Kansas City Electric Light Co.
...v. Electric Light Co., 164 Mass., loc. cit. 493, 41 N. E. 675, 32 L. R. A. 400, 49 Am. St. Rep. 477; McLaughlin v. Electric Light Co., 100 Ky. 173, 37 S. W. 851, 34 L. R. A. 812; Ennis v. Gray, 87 Hun (N. Y.) loc. cit. 357, 34 N. Y. Supp. 379; Higgins v. Dewey, 107 Mass. 494, 9 Am. Rep. 63.......
-
Alexander v. Nanticoke Light Company
... ... amounting to that of an insurer: Smith v. East End ... Electric Light Co., 198 Pa. 19; Fitzgerald v. Edison ... Co., 200 Pa. 540 ... Plaintiff ... Citizens' Electric Co., 52 S.W. Repr. 830; ... McLaughlin v. Louisville Electric Light Co., 100 Ky ... 173; [*] Geismann v. Missouri-Edison ... Electric ... ...
-
Lewis' Adm'r v. Louisville Electric Light Co.
...insulating one of its wires carrying a current of 2,000 volts. The facts of the case are similar to those shown in McLaughlin v. Light Co., 100 Ky. 173, 37 S.W. 851, and the instructions here were substantially the same those condemned in that case, which was decided after this case was tri......