Mclendon v. City Of La Grange

Decision Date06 October 1933
Docket NumberNo. 23052.,23052.
Citation171 S.E. 307,47 Ga.App. 690
PartiesMcLENDON . v. CITY OF LA GRANGE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Syllabus by Editorial Staff.

Error from Superior Court, Troup County; W. T. Tuggle, Judge.

Suit between M. F. McLendon and the City of La Grange. Judgment for the last-named party, the first-named party's motion for a new trial was overruled, and the first-named party brings error.

Affirmed.

J. R. Terrell, Jr., and E. T. Moon, both of La Grange, for plaintiff in error.

Lovejoy & Mayer, of La Grange, for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court.

BROYLES, Chief Judge.

1. "Where in a civil case the undisputed evidence clearly establishes a particular fact, it is not error for the judge, in his charge to the jury, to assume or indicate that the fact has been proved. To do so is not a violation of section 4863 of the Civil Code of 1910." Watkins v. Stulb, 23 Ga. App. 181 (4), 98 S. E. 94, and citations. Applying this ruling to the facts of the instant case, there is no merit in the ground of the motion for a new trial complaining of an excerpt from the charge of the court

2. "In a ground of a motion for new trial complaining of the illegal admission of evidence it must appear that the evidence was material and prejudicial to the movant, and how it was hurtful to him." (Italics ours.) Davis v. McKenzie Motor Co., 46 Ga. App. 151 (1), 166 S. E. 869, and citations. Under the foregoing ruling and the facts of the instant case, special ground 2 of the motion for a new trial raises no question for the consideration of this court.

3. Jurors are not absolutely bound to accept as correct the opinions or estimates of witnesses as to the value of property, though uncontradicted by other testimony, but have the right to consider the nature of the property involved, together with any other fact or circumstance properly within their knowledge, throwing light upon the question, and they may, by their verdict, fix either a lower or a higher value upon the property than that stated in the opinions or estimates of the witnesses. Georgia Northern Ry. Co. v. Battle, 22 Ga. App. 665 (1), 666, 97 S. E. 94, and citations. See, also, Baker v. Richmond Works, 105 Ga. 225 (1), 31 S. E. 426; McCarthy v. Lazarus, 137 Ga. 282 (2), 73 S. E. 493. Ap plying the foregoing ruling to the facts of the case at bar, this court cannot hold that the verdict was unauthorized by any evidence. Judgment affirmed.

MacINTYRE and GUERRY, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Department of Transp. v. Driggers, 57424
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 13, 1979
    ...60(1), 150 S.E.2d 327, supra; accord, Garner v. Gwinnett County, 105 Ga.App. 714, 719, 125 S.E.2d 563. See also McLendon v. City of LaGrange, 47 Ga.App. 690(3), 171 S.E. 307; Southern v. Cobb County, 78 Ga.App. 58(2), 50 S.E.2d 226, supra; Sammons v. Copeland, 85 Ga.App. 318, 321, 69 S.E.2d......
  • Hogan v. Olivera, 52664
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 24, 1977
    ...in the opinions and estimates of the witnesses. See Southern v. Cobb County, 78 Ga.App. 58(2), 50 S.E.2d 226; McLendon v. City of LaGrange, 47 Ga.App. 690, 691(3), 171 S.E. 307; Sammons v. Copeland, 85 Ga.App. 318, 320-322(1), 69 S.E.2d 617; and cits. in these Generally, examination of the ......
  • Stapleton v. Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • December 17, 1979
    ...reaching a net excessive award of $6,000.00.6 Southern v. Cobb County, 78 Ga.App. 58, 50 S.E.2d 226 (1948); McLendon v. City of La Grange, 47 Ga.App. 690, 171 S.E. 307 (1933); Sammons v. Copeland, 85 Ga.App. 318, 69 S.E.2d 617 (Ga.App.1952).7 An appellate court may itself order a new trial ......
  • United States v. 2,049.85 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • February 12, 1943
    ...States, 69 App.D.C. 129, 99 F.2d 362, 365(3); United States v. Seufert Brothers Co., C. C., 87 F. 35, 37, 38; McLendon v. City of LaGrange, 47 Ga.App. 690, 691 (3), 171 S.E. 307, and cases cited; Tyler v. Kemp, 147 Ga. 502, 94 S.E. 1003. While a jury `has no right arbitrarily to ignore or d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT