McMickens v. Waldrop
| Decision Date | 25 September 1981 |
| Citation | 406 So.2d 867 |
| Parties | David McMICKENS, Administrator of The Estate of LaVonne McMickens v. Edwin Glen WALDROP, M. D., et al. 80-395. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
P. Russell Tarver, Birmingham, for appellant.
John F. Whitaker and Catherine E. Crudup of Sadler, Sadler, Sullivan, Sharp & Stutts, Birmingham, for appellees.
The only issue on this appeal is whether to apply the medical malpractice statute of limitations or the wrongful death statute of limitations. The viability of this action for wrongful death allegedly arising out of an act of medical malpractice depends on the resolution of this question, which is one of first impression in the State of Alabama.
The Alabama Medical Liability Act (Code 1975, § 6-5-480, et seq.), provides that all actions against physicians for malpractice must be brought within two years of the act giving rise to the claim, or within six months of date of discovery, and in no event more than four years from the date of the act. The wrongful death statute (Code 1975, § 6-5-410), provides that the action must be brought within two years from and after the date of death.
Appellant David McMickens is the representative of the estate of his deceased wife, LaVonne McMickens, and is suing Dr. Edwin G. Waldrop and Dr. William H. Brakefield of Birmingham. The following timetable is helpful:
1Appellant argues that the Wrongful Death Act statute of limitations should apply to this lawsuit even though the act giving rise to the cause of action arose out of an alleged act of medical malpractice. Appellees, on the other hand, contend that the Alabama Medical Liability Act (Acts 1975, No. 513, Code 1975, § 6-5-480, et seq.), "provides a carefully designed statute of limitations which by its terms applies to 'all actions' for medical malpractice." We agree with the appellant.
The precise wording of the Alabama Medical Liability Act is as follows:
All actions against physicians, surgeons, ... for liability, error, mistake or failure to cure, whether based on contract or tort, must be commenced within two years next after the act or omission or failure giving rise to the claim, and not afterwards; ... (or) the action may be commenced within six months from the date of such discovery or the date of discovery of facts which would reasonably lead to such discovery, ... (but) in no event may the action be commenced more than four years after such act; ... (Emphasis added.)
Appellees contend that the use of the words "all actions" in the Alabama Medical Liability Act clearly shows a legislative intent to include wrongful death actions. In this case, if the Alabama Medical Liability Act applies, the action was barred because the last treatment administered to Mrs. McMickens by the defendants was four years and five months before the wrongful death action was filed.
There is no clear weight of authority in other jurisdictions on the question whether a medical malpractice statute of limitations or the wrongful death statute of limitations should apply when the genesis of the wrongful death action was medical malpractice. Some jurisdictions, construing provisions of their own state laws on the subject, hold that if death results from the wrongful act, the statute of limitations for wrongful death actions applies. See Baxter v. Zeller, 42 Or.App. 873, 601 P.2d 902 (1979); Hachmann v. Mayo Clinic, 150 F.Supp. 468 (D.Minn.1957); Klema v. St. Elizabeth's Hospital of Youngstown, 170 Ohio St. 519, 166 N.E.2d 765 (1960); Baysinger v. Hanser, 355 Mo. 1042, 199 S.W.2d 644 (1947) ().
Other jurisdictions have come to an exactly opposite conclusion and have applied the medical malpractice statute of limitations to a wrongful death action which arose out of an alleged claim of malpractice. See Pasquale v. Chandler, 350 Mass. 450, 215 N.E. 319 (1966); Camp v. Martin, 150 Ga.App. 51, 256 S.E.2d 657 (1979); Glass v. Camara, 369 So.2d 625 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1979); Eland v. Aylward, 373 So.2d 92 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1979).
As previously indicated, this is a case of first impression in Alabama and, as indicated, other jurisdictions reach different results; therefore, we must decide this case by construing the intent of the Alabama Legislature in passing the Alabama Medical Liability Act, and the effect of that Act, if any, upon the right of a personal representative to bring an action for wrongful death within two years of the death of his "testator or intestate." Code 1975, § 6-5-410.
The law of Alabama for many years has been that the two-year period provided for in the Wrongful Death Statute is a part of the substantive cause of action and is not to be treated as a statute of limitations. After two years, the remedy expires. Downtown Nursing Home v. Pool, 375 So.2d 465 (Ala.1979).
In view of the above, we conclude that the medical malpractice statute of limitations does not apply; therefore, the judgment of dismissal is due to be reversed and the cause remanded. Our decision should not be construed as holding that the legislature could not modify or change the two-year period now a part of the Wrongful Death Statute; we only hold that by passage of the Medical Malpractice Act, the legislature did not affect that two-year period.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
I concur in the result in this case but wish to reassert my views regarding the unconstitutionality of the Alabama Medical Liability Act expressed in my dissent in Reese FAULKNER, J., concurs.
v. Rankin Fite Memorial Hospital, 403 So.2d 158 (Ala.1981). Because I do not believe that act is constitutionally valid, I see...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
James v. Phoenix General Hosp., Inc., s. CV
...a medical malpractice action in § 12-561(2) was derived from repealed § 12-542(B). See supra note 6.9 See, e.g., McMickens v. Waldrop, 406 So.2d 867, 869 (Ala.1981) ("we must decide this case by construing the intent of the Alabama Legislature in passing the Alabama Medical Liability Act");......
-
Price v. Southern Ry. Co.
...issue since the enactment of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure. We cited Parker v. Fies & Sons, Inc., supra, in McMickens v. Waldrop, 406 So.2d 867 (Ala.1981), where Lavonne McMickens filed suit against two doctors for the harm caused her as a result of their alleged medical malpractice.......
-
Kruse v. Byrne
...period) applies to wrongful-death cases alleging medical malpractice. Hall v. Chi, 782 So. 2d 218 (Ala. 2000); and McMickens v. Waldrop, 406 So. 2d 867 (Ala. 1981)."). The statute of limitations began running from the date of Jordan's death - July 9, 2010. See Ala. Code § 6-5-410(d) ("The a......
-
Nailen v. Ford Motor Co.
...the remedy expires. (citations omitted) Downtown Nursing Home, Inc. v. Pool, 375 So.2d 465, 466 (Ala.1979). See also, McMickens v. Waldrop, 406 So.2d 867, 869 (Ala.1981). Furthermore, consistent with Alabama courts, Mississippi courts have long held that where the time fixed in which an act......