McNeil v. State, 5D13–1810.
| Decision Date | 24 April 2015 |
| Docket Number | No. 5D13–1810.,5D13–1810. |
| Parties | Brenton McNEIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Michael R. Ufferman, of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and L. Charlene Matthews, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
ON MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION
Following the issuance of our opinion in this case, Appellant, Brenton McNeil, moved for certification of a question of great public importance. We grant the motion and certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(v) as one of great public importance:
ARE THE COSTS IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 938.085, 938.08, AND 938.10, FLORIDA STATUTES (2006), ASSESSED “PER CASE” OR “PER COUNT”?
QUESTION CERTIFIED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
McNeil v. State
...IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 938.085, 938.08, AND 938.10, FLORIDA STATUTES (2006), ASSESSED "PER CASE" OR "PER COUNT"?McNeil v. State , 163 So.3d 661 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, we answer the certified question b......
-
Dixon v. State
...IMPOSED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 938.085, 938.08, AND 938.10, FLORIDA STATUTES (2006), ASSESSED "PER CASE" OR "PER COUNT"?McNeil v. State, 163 So.3d 661, 661 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015).The Florida Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction to review this court's decision in McNeil. We again certify as a matt......