Melish v. Melish, 2005-02449.

Decision Date08 November 2006
Docket Number2005-02449.
Citation34 A.D.3d 436,823 N.Y.S.2d 350,2006 NY Slip Op 08100
PartiesMICHELLE MELISH, Respondent, v. ANDREW AUGUST MELISH, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The determination of the Supreme Court that the appellant was concealing income, that his failure to pay child support was willful, and that means of enforcement other than contempt would be ineffective is supported by credible evidence in the record (see Domestic Relations Law § 245; Higbee v Higbee, 260 AD2d 603 [1999]).

The appellant's remaining contentions are not properly before this Court.

The circumstances of this case do not warrant the imposition of sanctions upon the appellant for prosecuting this appeal (see Capuano v Platzner Intl. Group, 5 AD3d 620 [2004]).

Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Keller v. Keller
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 25, 2015
    ...such further attempts “would have been futile” (Scopelliti v. Scopelliti, 65 A.D.3d 1120, 1121, 885 N.Y.S.2d 512 ; see Melish v. Melish, 34 A.D.3d 436, 823 N.Y.S.2d 350 ; Turk v. Turk, 226 A.D.2d 448, 449, 640 N.Y.S.2d 802 ; Kaminski v. Kaminski, 212 A.D.2d 1045, 623 N.Y.S.2d 671 ; Demchuk ......
  • Malafronte v. Ford
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 8, 2006
  • Plaza Restoration, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 8, 2006

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT