Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center v. Levy, SLOAN-KETTERING

Decision Date16 October 1996
Docket NumberNo. 96-187,SLOAN-KETTERING,96-187
Citation681 So.2d 842
Parties21 Fla. L. Weekly D2223 MEMORIALCANCER CENTER, Appellant, v. Salomon LEVY and Donald H. Kane, as Personal Representatives; et al., Appellees. Third District
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellot, Harvey W. Gurland, Jr. and Paul R. Wallace, Miami, for appellant.

Golden & Cowan, and Joe N. Unger, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center [Sloan-Kettering] appeals from the trial court's order finding that its Petition for Revocation of Probate of Codicil is barred as untimely pursuant to sections 733.212(1)(b) and (5), Florida Statutes (1995). Sloan-Kettering also appeals from a portion of that same order that found that the appellees are entitled to an award of attorney's fees against Sloan-Kettering. We affirm, in part, and dismiss a portion of this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Section 733.212(3), Florida Statutes (1995), requires the personal representative to serve a copy of the Notice of Administration on certain individuals, including beneficiaries such as Sloan-Kettering "in a manner provided for service of formal notice." The personal representatives strictly complied with this requirement when they mailed a certified letter containing the Notice of Administration to Sloan-Kettering and a Sloan-Kettering employee signed a receipt acknowledging that the certified letter was received. Therefore, since Sloan-Kettering did not file its Petition for Revocation of Probate of Codicil within the time period stated in sections 733.212(1)(b) and (5), Florida Statutes (1995), the trial court correctly found that the petition is barred as untimely. Moreover, contrary to the position taken by Sloan-Kettering, we find that In re Estate of Tarmy, 518 So.2d 471 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), is inapplicable because in the instant case, there are no facts that would give rise to an estoppel claim. Accordingly, we affirm the portion of the order finding that the petition is barred as untimely.

Finally, because the trial court's order finding that the appellees were entitled to an award of attorney's fees against the appellant did not fix the amount, we dismiss that portion of the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Gonzalez Eng'g, Inc. v. Miami Pump & Supply Co., 641 So.2d 474 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

Affirmed, in part; appeal dismissed, in part.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Ocean Club Community Association, Inc. v. Curtis
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 9, 2005
    ...HCI Mfg., Inc., 901 So.2d 304 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Lydolph v. Davidson, 880 So.2d 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Mem'l Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr. v. Levy, 681 So.2d 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA Affirmed. ...
  • Cason ex rel. Saferight v. Hammock
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 24, 2005
    ...Prob. R. 5.240 (requiring that all beneficiaries be formally served with the notice of administration); Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr. v. Levy, 681 So.2d 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); In re Estate of Ballett, 426 So.2d 1196, 1199 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) ("If interested persons are to be limited......
  • Chaiken v. Suchman
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 28, 1997
    ...awarding entitlement to attorney's fees does not become final until the amount of the fee is set. See Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr. v. Levy, 681 So.2d 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Boyce v. Cluett, 672 So.2d 858, 860 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Easley, McCaleb & Stallings, Ltd. v. Gibbons, 667 So......
  • Local Door Coupons Franchise, Inc. v. Mayers
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 19, 2018
    ...127 So.3d 833, 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) ; Reid v. Estate of Sonder, 63 So.3d 7, 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) ; Mem'l Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr., v. Levy, 681 So.2d 842, 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). From our jurisdictional perspective, we view the instant order – determining only a shareholder's right to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Probate
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Florida Small-Firm Practice Tools - Volume 1-2 Volume 2
    • April 1, 2023
    ...trusts in the manner of Formal Notice. [Fla. Stat. §733.212 (1), Fla. Prob. R. 5.240(a); Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center v. Levy , 681 So. 2d 842, 842 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (formal notice effected through mailing of certified letter, return receipt requested).] The notice of administrat......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT