Metropolitan Dade County v. Dusseau
Decision Date | 17 December 1998 |
Docket Number | No. 98-1612 | 98-1611. |
Citation | 725 So.2d 1169 |
Parties | METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and University Baptist Church, Inc., Petitioners, v. Charles DUSSEAU, et al., Respondents. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert A. Ginsburg, County Attorney, and Augusto E. Maxwell, Assistant County Attorney, for petitioner Metropolitan Dade County.
Bilzin Sumberg Dunn Price & Axelrod, Stanley B. Price, Eileen Ball Mehta, and Michael W. Larkin, Miami; Steel Hector & Davis and Alvin B. Davis, Miami, for petitioner University Baptist Church.
Shubin & Bass and Jeffrey S. Bass, Miami, for respondents.
Before NESBITT, GERSTEN and GODERICH, JJ.
The petitioners, University Baptist Church, Inc. [UBC] and Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners [Commission], seek a writ of certiorari quashing the decision of the Circuit Court, Appellate Division, which reversed the Commission's approval of UBC's zoning application. We grant the petition.
UBC owns 19.7 acres of land that is zoned EU1 (Single Family One Acre Estate District). Under Miami-Dade County land use regulations, churches are permitted as a special exception in areas that are zoned EU1. In November 1996, UBC applied for a special exception to permit the construction of a church on the property. The floor plan that was submitted consisted of a sanctuary, fellowship hall, Sunday School, and administrative space. The application also sought an unusual use approval for a day care center and a sewer lift station.
Initially, the Zoning and Planning Departments were unsatisfied with the site plan. However, after extensive revision of the site plan, the Zoning Division found that UBC's application was compatible with the existing neighborhood and recommended approval. The Planning Division also found that the proposed church was in compliance with the Miami-Dade County Code, consistent with the Comprehensive Development Master Plan, and compatible with the surrounding area. Further, the Department of Environmental Resources Management recommended approval of the application as long as the natural forest community was preserved, to which UBC agreed. The Public Works Department, the Water and Sewer Authority, the Fire Department, the Metro-Dade Transit Agency, the School Board, the Solid Waste Department, the Parks Department, the Public Safety Department, and the Aviation Department also recommended approval of the application.
On December 4, 1996, the County's Zoning Appeals Board denied the application without prejudice. Thereafter, UBC filed its appeal to the Commission.
The Commission heard UBC's appeal on February 20, 1997. During the hearing, UBC explained that all the county agencies that examined the application, including the Zoning Department and Planning Department, recommended approval of the application. Further, UBC presented evidence that indicated that the project complied with or exceeded the Miami-Dade County Code, was consistent with the Comprehensive Development Master Plan, and was compatible with the surrounding area. Other experts...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Miami-Dade County v. Reyes
...departure from the essential requirements of law for a circuit court to re-weigh evidence. See Metropolitan Dade County Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Dusseau, 725 So.2d 1169, 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Blumenthal, 675 So.2d at The circuit court discounted the Hearing Officer's finding because it c......
-
Dusseau v. METRO. DADE CO. BD. OF COM'RS
...and Elliot H. Scherker of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, FL, for Respondents. SHAW, J. We have for review Metropolitan Dade County v. Dusseau, 725 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), based on conflict with Education Development Center, Inc. v. City of West Palm Beach, 541 So.2d 106 (Fla. 1989).......
-
Miami-Dade County v. NEW LIFE APOS. CHURCH, 3D99-1626.
...So.2d 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Miami-Dade County v. Hernandez, 738 So.2d 407 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Metropolitan Dade County, Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Dusseau, 725 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Metropolitan Dade County v. Section 11 Property Corp., 719 So.2d 1204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), review den......
-
Marion County v. Priest
...1998) (circuit court is not authorized to decide questions of zoning policy de novo); see also Metropolitan Dade County, Bd. of County Comm'rs v. Dusseau, 725 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1998) (Commission's decision on special exception and unusual use was supported by competent substantial ev......