Midland Nat. Bank v. Brightwell
Decision Date | 21 February 1899 |
Citation | 148 Mo. 358,49 S.W. 994 |
Parties | MIDLAND NAT. BANK OF KANSAS CITY v. BRIGHTWELL. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
A bank sent to another items for collection, which it received and collected, partly by accepting a draft of another bank, and by charging the accounts of its depositors. Such drafts, together with one of its own, were forwarded in settlement, but were not paid, as both banks made assignments. Held, that the first bank did not have a preference over general creditors of the insolvent collecting bank on account of such collections, since, as it received no money, and there was no augmentation of its assets by such collection, no trust fund was created in its favor.
Appeal from circuit court, Saline county; Richard Field, Judge.
Action by the Midland National Bank of Kansas City, Mo., against R. T. Brightwell, assignee of Slater Savings Bank. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed.
This cause was heard and decided by the circuit court of Saline county, on the following agreed statement of facts: No other evidence was offered at the trial. Thereupon the defendant prayed the court to declare the law to be "that, under the agreed statement of facts herein, plaintiff is not entitled to charge the above check of $2,650 as a trust fund against the Slater Savings Bank, and that the plaintiff is not entitled to a preference in its favor over the general creditors of the Slater Savings Bank, but that the said sum of $2,650 may be allowed as a general claim against the assets of said bank in the hands of the defendant, as assignee thereof," — which declaration of law the court refused to give, and defendant duly excepted to said refusal. The circuit court then rendered a decree that the said sum of $2,650 collected by the Slater Savings Bank was received as a trust fund, and was held as such when said bank failed, and that the assignee held it in the same way; and the court further found there were sufficient assets in the hands of the assignee to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bellevue State Bank v. Coffin
... ... ( State v. Bruce, 17 Idaho 1, 134 Am. St. 245, 102 P ... 831; First Nat. Bank v. Bunting & Co., 7 Idaho 27, ... 59 P. 929, 1106; State v. Thum, 6 Idaho 323, 55 P ... 78, 53 N.W. 923; In re Seven ... Corners Bank , 58 Minn. 5, 59 N.W. 633; Midland Nat ... Bank v. Brightwell , 148 Mo. 358, 71 Am. St. 608, 49 S.W ... 994; Frank v. Bingham , ... ...
-
In re Guy
...29 L.R.A. 226, 63 Am.St.Rep. 47; Warren v. Bank, 157 N.Y. 259, 51 N.E. 2036, 43 L.R.A. 256, 68 Am.St.Rep. 777; Bank v. Brightwell, 148 Mo. 358, 49 S.W. 994, 71 Am.St.Rep. 608, 614, Id. at 63 N.E. 476 (Emphasis added). Thus, it appears clear to the court that the Supreme Court has treated a ......
-
National City Bank of St. Louis v. Macon Creamery Co.
...Such credit may be treated as provisional, if the paper is afterward dishonored, and the credit may be cancelled. Midland Nat. Bank v. Brightwell, 148 Mo. 358. The title to paper deposited in a bank for the purpose of collection does not pass to the bank. Northwestern Nat. Bank v. Bank of C......
-
Massey-Harris Harvester Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City
... ... Bank v. Bank, 71 Mo.App. 451; Maronde v ... Vollerwider, 279 S.W. 774; Midland Natl. Bank v ... Brightwell, 148 Mo. 358; Landa v. Traders Bank, ... 94 S.W. 773; Natl. Bank ... ...