Milbrandt & Co., Inc. v. Griffin
Decision Date | 27 June 2005 |
Docket Number | 2004-04120. |
Citation | 2005 NY Slip Op 05569,19 A.D.3d 663,797 N.Y.S.2d 291 |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Parties | MILBRANDT & CO., INC., Appellant, v. JOHN W. GRIFFIN et al., Respondents. |
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents.
(Provident Life & Cas. Ins. Co. v Brittenham, 284 AD2d 518 [2001]; see Setsuo Ito v Dryvit Sys., 5 AD3d 735 [2004]). The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was to compel the defendant John W. Griffin to comply with discovery demands.
To continue reading
Request your trial4 cases
-
Alberto v. Jackson
...improvidently made ( see Casabona v. Huntington Union Free School Dist., 29 A.D.3d 723, 723, 816 N.Y.S.2d 143;Milbrandt & Co., Inc. v. Griffin, 19 A.D.3d 663, 797 N.Y.S.2d 291;Ito v. Dryvit Sys., 5 A.D.3d 735, 773 N.Y.S.2d 599;Provident Life & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Brittenham, 284 A.D.2d 518, 72......
-
Foster v. Herbert Slepoy Corp.
...816 N.Y.S.2d 143; see Andon v. 302-304 Mott St. Assoc., 94 N.Y.2d 740, 746, 709 N.Y.S.2d 873, 731 N.E.2d 589; Milbrandt & Co., Inc. v. Griffin, 19 A.D.3d 663, 797 N.Y.S.2d 291; Provident Life & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Brittenham, 284 A.D.2d 518, 727 N.Y.S.2d 142). Here, the Supreme Court provident......
- Milbrandt & Co., Inc. v. Griffin
- In the Matter of Ford v. Schulman, 2005-02096.