Milburn Manuf'G Co. v. Peak
Decision Date | 10 February 1896 |
Citation | 34 S.W. 102 |
Parties | MILBURN MANUF'G CO. v. PEAK. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Action between the Milburn Manufacturing Company and Mrs. Florence Peak. From the judgment the Milburn Manufacturing Company brings error. Case certified from the court of civil appeals.
R. Y. Prigmore and Nugent & Essex, for appellant. Ross & Terrell, for appellee.
The court of civil appeals have certified to us the question: "Whether the contract hereinafter set out had the effect of merely making Hood & Co. the factors of appellant, or whether they thereby became the vendees of appellant; that is to say, whether the contract should be construed on its face as one of consignment merely, or one of sale."
The contract referred to in the above certificate is, in substance, as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Charles M. Stieff, Inc., v. City of San Antonio
...F. 1, certiorari denied 212 U.S. 577, 29 S.Ct. 686, 53 L.Ed. 658; In re Columbus Buggy Co., 8 Cir., 143 F. 859; Milburn Manufacturing Co. v. Peak, 89 Tex. 209, 34 S.W. 102. Thus, there may be a consignment for the purpose of sale to a stranger, but not a sale to the receiver, without in the......
-
City of San Antonio v. Chas. M. Stieff, Inc.
...1, certiorari denied 212 U. S. 577, 29 S. Ct. 686, 53 L. Ed. 658; In re Columbus Buggy Co. (C. C. A.) 143 F. 859; Milburn Manufacturing Co. v. Peak, 89 Tex. 209, 34 S. W. 102. Thus, there may be a consignment for the purpose of sale to a stranger, but not a sale to the receiver, without in ......
-
Mathis Equipment Co. v. Rosson
...Crews v. Harlan, 99 Tex. 93, 87 S.W. 656, 658 (1905); Harling v. Creech, 88 Tex. 300, 31 S.W. 357 (1895); Milburns Manuf'g Co. v. Peak, 89 Tex. 209, 34 S.W. 102, 103 (1896). As stated in the case last cited: 'In case of sale, the property in the goods passes to the vendee, and, though the c......
-
Arbuckle v. Kirkpatrick
... ... 158, 18 S.E. 482; Bank v. Goodyear, 90 Ga ... 711, 16 S.E. 962; Manufacturing Co. v. Peak (Tex ... Sup.) 34 S.W. 102; Plow Co. v. Rodgers, 53 Kan ... 743, 37 P. 111. We examine these ... Co. v. Peak (Tex. Sup.; 1896) 34 S.W. 102. The contract ... provided that the Milburn Company appointed Hood & Co. its ... agent to sell vehicles. Hood & Co. were to make all ... ...