Miller v. State
| Decision Date | 19 May 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. 97-3070,97-3070 |
| Citation | 731 So.2d 866 |
| Parties | 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1207 Tyrone L. MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County. Joseph E. Smith, Judge.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and James W. Rogers, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.
Tyrone L. Miller was sentenced to concurrent terms of forty months for resisting an officer, twelve months for battery, and twelve months for attempted battery on an officer. He was on probation in three other cases at the time of these offenses and he was sentenced to twenty-four months on the underlying criminal charge in each of the probation revocation cases. The sentences in the probation revocation cases were imposed concurrently with each other but consecutively to the sentences in the new offense.
We conclude that the trial court committed two sentencing errors. First, the trial court erred in classifying attempted battery on an officer as a first degree misdemeanor. Based on the rule in Merritt v. State, 712 So.2d 384 (Fla.1998), the trial court should have treated this offense as attempted battery which is a second degree misdemeanor. Although this error had no effect on the scoring, the defendant's sentence on this count must be reduced from twelve months to not more than sixty days. Second, the trial court erred in each of the three probation revocation cases by failing to give the defendant credit for the time he served in the Department of Corrections including the time he spent in the boot camp program, before his sentences were modified to probation. See State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989); Gardner v. State, 656 So.2d 933 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).
On remand, the trial court shall enter a new sentencing order which reflects that the defendant was convicted of attempted battery, and the sentence for that offense shall not exceed sixty days. Additionally, the sentences in the probation violation cases must credit the defendant with the time he served before the original sentences in those cases were modified to probation. The defendant need not be present for resentencing.
Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Petscher v. State, 5D05-3319.
...3d DCA 2004); Griffin v. State, 838 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Barger v. State, 744 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Miller v. State, 731 So.2d 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Moreover, the courts require that appropriate credit be given for time served when the defendant is sentenced for viola......
-
Griffin v. State, 3D02-1760.
...DCA 1999)(finding that trial court erred in failing to award defendant credit for time served while in boot camp); Miller v. State, 731 So.2d 866, 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)(same). He should not, however receive credit for his entire 364-day sentence as he did not serve all 364 days, but was o......
- Nunez v. State, 98-3080.