Miller v. The Municipal Electric Lighting & Power Co.

Decision Date10 March 1896
Citation34 S.W. 585,133 Mo. 205
PartiesMiller, Trustee, Appellant, v. The Municipal Electric Lighting & Power Company et al
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. -- Hon. Jacob Klein Judge.

Affirmed.

Rowell & Ferriss and John W. Noble for appellant.

(1) The court erred in its construction of the contract sued upon. Ayers v. Hays, 13 Mo. 252; Boxley v Stevens, 31 Mo. 201; Miller v. Wagenhauser, 18 Mo.App. 11; Hadden v. Collector, etc., 5 Wall. 107; Johnson v. Wood, 84 Mo. 508. (2) The court erred in excluding testimony as to the facts surrounding the execution of the contract, the situation and circumstances of the parties, their knowledge of certain facts bearing upon the terms of the contract and their general object in making the contract, as well as the acts of the parties showing the construction which they placed upon it themselves. Jones Construction of Contracts, sec. 42; Union Depot Co. v. Railroad Co., 113 Mo. 225; Mathews v. Danaby, 26 Mo.App. 660.

Lionberger & Shepley for respondent.

(1) The contract between the parties having been reduced to writing, parol evidence of prior or contemporary "understandings," "purposes," "qualifications," etc., was properly excluded. Tracy v. Iron Works, 104 Mo. 199; Evans v. Brass Co., 118 Mo. 553. (2) It was the duty of the court to construe the contract, and its construction was the only one justified by the language of the instrument. Brawley v. U.S., 96 U.S. 171; Norrington v. White, 115 U.S. 188; 2 Benj. on Sales, 686.

OPINION

Brace, P. J.

This is an action to recover the sum of $ 115,392.22 alleged to be due plaintiff as trustee of the Rohan Brothers Boiler Manufacturing Company, for the erection and construction by the said boiler company of nineteen boilers on the premises of the defendant in the city of St. Louis and to enforce a mechanic's lien upon said premises for said sum.

The petition alleges that the boilers so erected had a capacity of eleven thousand, four hundred horse power, admits the receipt of $ 115,508.41, and asks judgment for the amount first aforesaid, as balance due for the horse power alleged to have been furnished at the rate of $ 18.50 per horse power.

The answer admits the furnishing by said boiler company at defendant's request of a boiler plant consisting of nineteen boilers, and the payment of the amount of money credited therefor, and avers that said boiler plant was furnished by said company pursuant to and under the following specifications and proposal, which were accepted by the power company, to wit:

"SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ERECTION OF BOILER PLANT OF 6,000 H. P. AND ALL NECESSARY APPURTENANCES.

"BOILERS.

"Boilers to be twenty in number and to be at least 300 H. P. each, and to stand a working pressure of at least 110 lbs. to sq. in. All material to be Park Brothers 60,000 lbs. flange steel. All tubes of best standard make, and workmanship to be first-class in every particular. All bracing and stay bolts to be of best material and spaced so as to allow a hydraulic test of 160 lbs. to sq. in. Suitable openings to be made to allow boilers to be cleaned handily. Boilers to be built and placed as architect and chief engineer may direct, and as may best suit building erected by the company.

"FITTINGS, VALVES, ETC.

"Each boiler to have a complete set of fittings, as follows: One 2 1-2 inch check, one 2 1-2 blow-off, and one 5 inch pop safety valve, three gauge cocks, one combination water and steam gauge, one low water alarm gauge, all of the best standard make and all steam gauges to be nickel plated.

"HEATERS, FITTERS, ETC.

"Heaters to be six in number, 'each of 1,000 H. P. capacity,' the feed water to pass through a sufficient length of coil to heat same with exhaust steam to 200 deg., and this water to be further heated to not less than 255 deg., by taking sufficient water from boiler to raise feed water to that temperature. Heater to contain a coke chamber large enough to properly filter water enough to supply sufficient feed water for 1,000 H. P. boilers. Heaters to have all necessary fittings to operate the same, and guaranteed to supply as pure water as any appliance in use.

"PUMPS.

"Boilers to be supplied with six Duplex pumps of standard make and of suitable size to supply all the boilers when operating at a medium speed. One extra pump to be supplied and to be used as a fire pump or feed pump in case of the breaking down of either of the six before mentioned.

"Six circulating pumps to pump sufficient water into filter to raise the temperature of feed water to 255 deg., before passing through filter. All the above pumps to be of first-class make and to be kept in repair for contractor for at least one year.

"FOUNDATIONS, ETC.

"A concrete foundation two feet deep, twelve feet wide and the full length of the building for each of the three rows of boilers; if any deeper foundation is necessary the company is to stand the expense of same. All of the brickwork exposed to the fire to be of fire brick, the balance to be good red brick. All brickwork to be laid in fire clay.

"CASTINGS.

"Boilers to have good substantial cast-iron base with ash doors as near air-tight as possible. One cast-iron plate on top with suitable manholes to enter smoke box. Grate bars with suitable openings for firing with nut or slack coal.

"STACK.

"One stack 13 feet diameter by 178 feet from base. Base, bottom ring 8 feet long and knees to be 3-8 inch iron, and the balance 1-4 inch. Suitable foundation bolts and washers supplied and stack to be constructed so as to resist all storms. No 'guy rods' to be used. Suitable upstakes and horizontal flue No. 8 iron as may be designed by the company's architect.

"STEAM PIPES.

"All necessary steam pipes of such diameter, thickness, and length as may be designed by the company, with all valves, ells, tees, flanges that may be necessary to connect boilers with engines. Any expansion joints that may be needed to be supplied by the company.

"RECAPITULATION.

"Boilers to be erected, all connections to be made that are necessary to connect feed pumps, heaters and filters, steampipe to engines, exhaust pipe from engines, stack erected complete, all flue connections from boiler, the whole to make a complete plant ready for steam. All work to be first-class, and all modern devices used, necessary for the safe operation of the plant -- the erection to be done under the supervision of your chief engineer, but any changes made by him to be adjusted by a committee of arbitration, composed of one appointed by your company, but not your engineer, one appointed by us, the third selected by the two mentioned. The decision of this committee to be final."

"PROPOSAL.

"July 8, 1889.

"Municipal Electric Light & Power Company.

"Gentlemen: -- We propose to make and erect boilers as per specifications, and guarantee plant to be as economic as any plant in use, for the sum of $ 18.50 per horse power, said horse power to be demonstrated by actual test.

"We agree to have fourteen boilers ready for use by December 15, 1889, and the balance by January 20, 1890, and any failure on our part to comply with the terms of this contract will compel us to pay a forfeit of $ 25 per day for every day after the time above mentioned.

"We propose to complete revolving grate bars and automatic stoker on seventh boiler on north row, for the sum of $ 3,020.

"Will complete the thirteen boilers to be fired by hand, so as to leave as little work as possible when needed to use in connection with stoker, for the sum of $ 2,250. Or will complete whole plant with revolving grate and stoker, for $ 10,200.

"Rohan Bros. Boiler Mfg. Co.,

"JJR."

The answer then denies that the boilers had the capacity claimed, and alleges that the defendant had paid for more than the six thousand horse power contracted for, and that the boilers erected failed to comply with the specifications and proposal aforesaid, in various particulars to the damage of defendant in the sum of $ 53,000, for which judgment is asked.

The reply denies generally the allegations of the answer; admits, however, certain deviations from the terms of the contract on various grounds, and alleges that defendant accepted the boilers as if done in conformity with the specifications.

On the trial the plaintiff admitted the contract as set out in the answer, and that such contract was not afterward modified, or changed by the parties; introduced parol evidence tending to prove that the work was done under the supervision and direction of defendant's agent appointed for that purpose, and was accepted as conforming to the contract; admitted that the amount paid by defendant is equal to the full amount of six thousand horse power at $ 18.50 per horse power, and all extras charged for; and then made the following offers of proof by oral testimony.

"Mr Noble: The plaintiff offers to prove by certain witnesses, by Mr. Rohan and others, that at the time that this agreement was entered into there was within the contemplation of the parties as expressed by the president, then acting, of the defendant company, and by the chief engineer of the defendant company, then acting, the mechanical engineer and the superintendent of the works, then acting, the intention that the contract as made should not be confined to six thousand horse power, but that the contractors should have the benefit of all horse power over six thousand that the boilers would produce within the limits of the boilers as described in the specifications. We propose to prove that, not only in general but in particular, by Mr. Rohan, who was secretary of the plaintiff contracting company, by Mr. Sutter, the president of the defendant company, by...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT