Moore v. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n
Decision Date | 09 May 1922 |
Docket Number | (No. 795.) |
Citation | 241 S.W. 1105 |
Parties | MOORE et al. v. LUMBERMEN'S RECIPROCAL ASS'N. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Jefferson County; E. A. McDowell, Judge.
Proceeding by Minnie Sanders, for compensation for injuries under the Employers' Liability Act, opposed by the Mardez Lumber Company, employer, and the Lumbermen's Reciprocal Association, insurance carrier. The insurance carrier brought suit to set aside the award of the Industrial Accident Board, and from the judgment setting aside award, and giving them insufficient relief, Mrs. Alice Moore and others, the heirs of Minnie Sanders, appeal. Affirmed.
Collins, Morris & Barnes, of Beaumont, for appellants.
Andrews, Streetman, Logue & Mobley, of Houston, for appellee.
O'QUINN, J.
This is an agreed case on the facts. They show:
(1) That on December 29, 1919, the Mardez Lumber Company was operating a sawmill at Benford, Tex., and on said date was a subscriber to the Employers' Liability Act (Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. Supp. 1918, arts. 5246 — 1 to 5246—91), carrying a policy of insurance with the Lumbermen's Reciprocal Association, appellee herein. On said date Pete Sanders was an employé of said Mardez Lumber Company, and was covered by said policy of insurance, and on said date sustained injuries in the course of his employment, resulting in his immediate death. Minnie Sanders, wife of said Pete Sanders, and daughter of appellants, gave due notice to the Mardez Lumber Company and to the Lumbermen's Reciprocal Association, appellee, of the injury and death of her husband, and made claim for compensation, liability for which was admitted by appellee. The average weekly wages of Pete Sanders was $18.79, making the compensation rate $11.27 per week. Appellee paid to Minnie Sanders $5.63 per week for 27 weeks, but withheld $5.64 per week for said time for the unborn child of the enceinte mother, Minnie Sanders. Checks for $5.63 were sent to Minnie Sanders for the weeks ending July 13 and July 20, 1920, which she did not cash. The unborn child, for which the 29 installments for $5.64 each were reserved, was stillborn on July 20, 1920. Minnie Sanders died intestate July 21, 1920, leaving no debts owing by her estate. Her sole heirs are her father, Ed. L. Moore, and mother, Mrs. Alice Moore, appellants. At the time of Minnie Sanders' death her mother, Alice Moore, was divorced from her husband, and was living with her daughter, Minnie Sanders, and was dependent upon her son-in-law, Pete Sanders, for support. The appellee refused to pay the 29 weekly payments of $5.64 each which had been reserved for the stillborn child, amounting to $163.56, and also refused to pay the two payments for the weeks ending July 13th and July 20th, amounting to $11.26, for which checks had been issued to Minnie Sanders, but not cashed. The total amount of insurance which had accrued to the beneficiaries of Pete Sanders up to the death of his wife, Minnie Sanders, amounted to $326.83, of which $152.91 had been paid, leaving $174.82 unpaid.
(2) That on August 12, 1921, the Industrial Accident Board made the following award:
(3) That within 20 days after said above set out award was made appellee gave notice to the adverse parties and to the Industrial Accident Board that it did not consent to and was not willing to abide by said award, and within 20 days thereafter filed this suit to set same aside.
The above facts are epitomized by appellee in its brief as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Haugse v. Sommers Bros. Manufacturing Co.
... ... Co. v. Salser (Tex. Civ. App.), ... 224 S.W. 557; Moore v. Lumbermen's Recip. Assn. (Tex ... Civ. App.), 241 S.W. 1105; Crawford ... ...
-
Bassett v. Stratford Lumber Co.
... ... 176, 168 P. 1121, L.R.A. 1918F, 561; Moore v ... Lumbermen's R. Ass'n (1922 Tex. Civ. App.) 241 ... S.W. 1105; La ... ...
-
Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. Dapperman
...not liable for costs. For other cases which in their result and reasoning support our conclusion here, see Moore et al. v. Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n (Tex. Civ. App.) 241 S. W. 1105; Id. (Tex. Com. App.) 262 S. W. 472; Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. Shilling (Tex. Com. App.) 28......
-
Moore v. Lumbermen's Reciprocal. Ass'n.
...behalf of themselves. Judgment setting aside award and giving defendants insufficient relief was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (241 S. W. 1105), and defendants bring error. Reversed and rendered (correcting judgment rendered on a former opinion in 258 S. W. Morris & Barnes, of Beau......