Moore v. State, A92A2278
Decision Date | 07 January 1993 |
Docket Number | No. A92A2278,A92A2278 |
Parties | MOORE v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Buford & Buford, Floyd M. Buford, Jr., Macon, for appellant.
Willis B. Sparks III, Dist. Atty., Graham A. Thorpe, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault (OCGA § 16-5-21), kidnapping (OCGA § 16-5-40), and rape (OCGA § 16-6-1). He challenges the admissibility of evidence of other rapes committed by him, the mode of proof of two of these crimes, and the trial court's order that he disclose the identity of a defense witness.
The present crime
Moore abducted a stranger at gunpoint from a bus stop, took her to a secluded lot, and engaged in forcible sexual intercourse after first having difficulty obtaining an erection. Afterwards, he took her to her job, which had been her destination.
When the victim returned to her job, she reported the rape immediately. She was crying and in an hysterical state, and she was taken to the hospital. Appellant was subsequently identified through a nolo contendere plea form bearing his name and found by the police at the crime scene after being taken there by the victim. Initially, appellant told the police that he did not know the victim. However, at trial he sought to establish that he did know her; that she was a prostitute and a user of crack cocaine whom he had been with on prior occasions; that he had paid her to have sex on the day in question, but he did not pay her the agreed amount because the act of sexual intercourse had not been completed; and that she accused him of rape because of this. The State presented rebuttal evidence.
The other crimes
A former Atlanta police officer testified that on July 5, 1969, he investigated a rape complaint by Jennie Cooley. Although he did not recollect the case, he testified following examination of his police report. He answered affirmatively when asked whether he was willing to swear under oath to the contents of the report. He testified that he had talked with the victim at Grady Hospital at about 10:35 a.m., and she told him that at 9:45 a.m. she was at a bus stop when a man whom she did not know drove up and asked her if she wanted a ride. She accepted the ride but rather than take her where she wanted to go, he drove her to a secluded, wooded area. He brandished a gun, made her get out of the car and go into the woods, robbed and raped her, and then left her in the woods. She later identified appellant as the culprit. The State introduced a certified copy of appellant's indictment, plea of guilty, and fifteen-year sentence (to serve ten years with five years suspended). The State presented evidence that Cooley has died.
An Atlanta police detective testified that on August 19, 1969, he investigated a rape complaint by Doris Thomas. Although he had no present recollection of the case, he also testified from his police report. He answered affirmatively when asked whether he was willing to swear under oath to the contents of the report. He testified that he had talked to the victim at about 10:15 a.m. concerning a rape which occurred at 9:00 a.m. that day. She stated that while she was waiting at a bus stop, a man drove up, pointed a gun at her, and ordered her to get into his car. He robbed her and took her to a secluded, wooded area where he raped her. Afterward, he brought her back to the bus stop. The State introduced a certified copy of appellant's indictment, plea of guilty, and fifteen-year sentence (to serve ten years with five years suspended) for her rape. The State presented evidence that it had tried unsuccessfully to locate Thomas.
Linda Jordan testified that at approximately 7:00 p.m. on January 16, 1969, she was abducted at gunpoint by appellant as she was unlocking her car door in a downtown Atlanta parking lot. He rambled through her pocketbook and asked her where her money was. He instructed her to get down on the floorboard or he would blow her head off. He drove her to a parking lot in a secluded area, told her to take her clothes off, and raped her. However, he was having trouble obtaining an erection. When she asked him how he was going to rape her if he could not get an erection, he slapped her and told her to shut up, at which point he expelled sperm all over her. The State introduced a certified copy of appellant's indictment, plea of guilty, five-year sentence for kidnapping, and five-year sentence for rape.
Frances Thompson testified that in 1979 she worked in an office building in downtown Atlanta. She was accosted by appellant while she was in a rest room in the building. He had a gun which he put to her head. He told her not to scream or he would kill her. He asked her if she had any money, which she did not. He took her into a stall and told her to take her clothes off. Although he was having trouble maintaining an erection, he raped her. The State introduced a certified copy of appellant's indictment, plea of guilty, and fifteen-year sentence.
1. Appellant contends that evidence of the 1969 Cooley and Thomas rapes was inadmissible because they were too remote, that evidence of the 1979 Thompson rape was inadmissible because it was dissimilar, and that evidence of all four of the other rapes was inadmissible because their prejudicial impact outweighed their probative value.
(a) Evidence of similar crimes is inadmissible except upon proof the defendant was the perpetrator of the independent crime, there is a sufficient similarity or connection between the independent crime and the crime charged so that proof of the former tends to prove the latter, and the evidence of the independent crime is offered not to raise an improper inference as to the accused's character, but for some permissible purpose regarding an issue in the case. Stephens v. State, 261 Ga. 467, 468(6), 405 S.E.2d 483 (1991); Williams v. State, 261 Ga. 640, 641(2), 409 S.E.2d 649 (1991).
This exception has been most liberally extended in cases involving sexual offenses, " 'for a reason peculiar to those crimes....' " Dorsey v. State, 204 Ga. 345, 349(2), 49 S.E.2d 886 (1948) ( ).
Sudlow v. State, 140 Ga.App. 146, 147, 230 S.E.2d 106 (1976); see McNeal v. State, 228 Ga. 633, 637(5), 187 S.E.2d 271 (1972) ( ); Davis v. State, 158 Ga.App. 549, 553(7), 281 S.E.2d 305 (1981).
Under the previously cited cases, the multiple similarities between the Cooley and Thomas rapes and the present rape met the requirement of similarity.
There were some similarities but also some differences between the Jordan rape and the present rape, but one rather distinctive feature of both was appellant's inability to obtain an erection in order to engage in sexual intercourse, followed by his ejaculation on the victims' bodies. There were few similarities between the Thompson rape and the present rape except for appellant's difficulty in maintaining an erection. Since, however, evidence of the Cooley and Thomas rapes was admissible, it is highly probable that any error on the part of the trial court in admitting evidence of the Jordan and Thompson rapes did not contribute to the verdict. Jones v. State, 175 Ga.App. 132(1), 332 S.E.2d 915 (1985).
(b) Appellant cites Gilstrap v. State, 261 Ga. 798(1), 410 S.E.2d 423 (1991), in support of his argument that evidence concerning the 1969 Cooley and Thomas rapes should have been excluded because of remoteness.
In Gilstrap, the Court held that a crime which took place 31 years in the past was too remote, while citing without disapproval Rich v. State, 254 Ga. 11, 14(1), 325 S.E.2d 761 (1985), and Cooper v. State, 173 Ga.App. 254, 255(1), 325 S.E.2d 877 (1985), where lapses of 11 years and 19 years, respectively, did not prohibit the admission of evidence of similar transactions. The lapse in the present case is 22 years, so that time wise it is more akin to Cooper than Gilstrap. But the fact that defendant was incarcerated during many of the intervening years precluded opportunity to commit similar offenses and explained their remoteness so they were not legally irrelevant. See Anderson v. State, 183 Ga.App. 669, 671(1), 359 S.E.2d 688 (1987). In such cases, the lapse of time goes to the weight and credibility of the evidence and not its admissibility. Cooper, supra, 173 Ga.App. 254-255(1), 325 S.E.2d 877.
Furthermore, as argued by appellant, Gilstrap noted that the purpose of a statute of limitation (which under OCGA § 17-3-1 is seven years for rape) is to protect individuals from having to defend themselves against charges when the basic facts may have become obscured by the passage of time, and the Court held...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McBee v. State
...and to this extent proof of the one tends to establish the other." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Moore v. State, 207 Ga.App. 412, 415(1)(a), 427 S.E.2d 779 (1993). Particularly in the area of sexual offenses, the admissibility of similar transaction evidence is liberally construed. W......
-
Miller v. State
...212 Ga.App. 17, 19(2), 440 S.E.2d 695 (1994); Bryson v. State, 210 Ga.App. 642, 643-644(2), 437 S.E.2d 352 (1993); Moore v. State, 207 Ga.App. 412, 414, 427 S.E.2d 779 (1993); Stine v. State, 199 Ga.App. 898, 899(2), 406 S.E.2d 292 (1991); Daniel v. State, 194 Ga.App. 495, 496(1), 391 S.E.2......
-
Roundtree v. State, S99A0111.
...incarcerated for most of the intervening period and, thus, had no opportunity to commit any other offenses. See Moore v. State, 207 Ga.App. 412, 416(1)(b), 427 S.E.2d 779 (1993). Moreover, without regard to the similarity of the prior offenses, it appears that evidence thereof would be admi......
-
Johnson v. State
...regard to appellant's assertion that he was denied his right to confront this witness, we note that this Court, in Moore v. State, 207 Ga.App. [412, 417, 427 S.E.2d 779 (1993)], held that when victims of crimes for which appellant had pled guilty were unavailable, it was not error to admit ......
-
Criminal Law - Frank C. Mills, Iii
...g. The transaction is outside the statute of limitations, uncharged and unadjudicated. (So far, no authority, but see Moore v. State, 207 Ga. App. 412, 416, 427 S.E.2d 779, 783 (1993) and Gilstrap v. State, 261 Ga. 798, 798-99, 410 S.E.2d 423, 424 (1991) for possibly useful dicta.) h. The d......