Moreira v. State, 84-2160
| Decision Date | 06 January 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-2160,84-2160 |
| Citation | 500 So.2d 343,12 Fla. L. Weekly 192 |
| Parties | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 192 Jesus MOREIRA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Mark J. Berkowitz, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.
The defendant appeals from an order departing upward from the sentencing guidelines for the following reasons:
1. The perpetration of these offenses created an extreme risk to the physical safety of both citizens and law enforcement officers. At least four people who were inside the victim's residence were subjected to having machine guns pointed at them by this defendant and threatened with bodily harm. Furthermore, the defendant threatened to kill everyone in the residence on at least two or three occasions. When the attempt was made to pick up the ransom money, the defendant, who was armed with a submachine gun, fired a substantial number of shots at one of the victims. This shooting took place at an Exxon Gas Station which was open for business and in the public thoroughfares of Dade County. Present, nearby, were other civilian witnesses as well as an FBI Agent assisting in the investigation into this kidnap for ransom. Garcia v. State, 455 So.2d 714 (Fla 1st DCA 1984); Johnson v. State, 462 So.2d 49 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Scurry v. State, 489 So.2d 25 (Fla.1986); Davis v. State, 476 So.2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Brinson v. State, (Fla. 2 DCA [1985] ).
2. The commission of offense created severe psychological trauma to members of the victim's family. The testimony established that the defendant tied up and abducted the victim in the victim's own residence in the presence of the victim's common law wife as well as other family members. Those family members were threatened with bodily harm if they resisted in any fashion. The emotional trauma on the victim's family members, who themselves witnessed the abduction of the victim, at machine gun point from his own residence, and not knowing whether they would ever see him alive again cannot be understated. The Court considers as especially compelling the fact that the victim was abducted from within his own home in the presence of his loved ones. Davis v. State, (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Olive v. State, 489 So.2d 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Scurry v. State, supra.
We conclude that both grounds are...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jordan v. State
...reason was proper under the facts of this case. See id.; Green v. State, 545 So.2d 359, 360 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Moreira v. State, 500 So.2d 343, 344 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CERTIFICATION COPE, J. Defendant-appellant Jordan moves for rehearing, contending that the dec......
-
Lumpkin v. State, 86-3058
...of a victim's family who witness the crime may be a valid reason for upward departure in some circumstances, see Moreira v. State, 500 So.2d 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (psychological trauma to victim's relatives valid reason for upward departure where victim tied up and abducted from his home i......
-
Sainz v. State, 3D00-1979.
...as a habitual offender. 5. The State had filed a motion to depart from the sentencing guidelines, relying on Baker and Moreira v. State, 500 So.2d 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). (R. 6.Brown involves the interpretation of a different statute of limitations, section 775.15, Florida Statutes, not the......
-
Gonzalez v. State, 94-1033
...597 So.2d 931 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), review denied, 605 So.2d 1262 (Fla.1992); Harris v. State, 531 So.2d 1349 (Fla.1988); Moreira v. State, 500 So.2d 343 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Sec. 921.001(7), Fla.Stat. (1993), or the imposition of consecutive minimum mandatory terms. State v. Thomas, 487 So.2d......