Morrison Assur. Co., Inc. v. City of Opa-Locka
| Decision Date | 04 November 1980 |
| Docket Number | OPA-LOCK,Nos. 79-1949,79-2374,F,s. 79-1949 |
| Parties | MORRISON ASSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. CITY OFlorida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Stephens, Schwartz, Lynn & Chernay and Robert M. Klein, Miami, for appellant.
Weintraub, Weintraub, Seiden, Dudley & Press and Jan K. Seiden, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
The City of Opa-Locka operates a recreational area known as Sherbondy Park, and has purchased from Morrison Assurance Company a comprehensive liability policy to cover injuries sustained by the public while on the premises. One Virginia Pitts sustained injuries at the park when she fell over a wheelbarrow left near a softball diamond. At the time of the incident, she was practicing with her team for an upcoming softball game.
Morrison sought a declaratory judgment of non-coverage below, and appeals from an adverse ruling. We reverse.
A policy exclusion provided that coverage would not extend "to bodily injury to any and all persons practicing, instructing, or participating in any physical training, sport, athletic activity or contest." The trial court ruled that the exclusion unambiguously did not pertain to "unauthorized, non-sponsored, unsupervised physical play or acts": Since Virginia's activity was unsupervised, etc., it was covered.
We find no policy reference to or any implicit suggestion of a policy distinction between supervised and unsupervised, sponsored and unsponsored, authorized and unauthorized play. Virginia was a member of a softball team. That team congregated at the park to practice for a game to take place later in the day. She was injured during the course of that practice. She was
It is urged that the city's intention was to purchase coverage for all incidents and occurrences except those involving authorized or sponsored participants, e. g. league teams, which provide their own insurance as a precondition to using the field. That may well be a valid statement of the city's intent, but absent ambiguity in the contract terms, a contract of insurance must be given effect as written. Midwest Mutual Insurance Co. v. Santiesteban, 287 So.2d 665 (Fla.1973); Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. Moore, 357 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
Reversed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Volusia Cnty. Cattlemen's Ass'n, Inc. v. W. World Ins. Co.
...injuries sustained while participating in what Plaintiff labels as "typical sports," such as softball, Morrison Assur. Co. v. City of Opa–Locka , 389 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), and running a fifty-yard dash, Morrison Assur. Co. v. Sch. Bd. of Suwannee Cty. , 414 So.2d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA ......
-
American Motorists Ins. Co. v. Farrey's Wholesale Hardware Co., Inc.
...287 So.2d 665 (Fla.1973); Boyd v. United States Fidelity & Guar. Co., 256 So.2d 1 (Fla.1971); Morrison Assurance Co., Inc. v. City of Opa-Locka, 389 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The fact that an insurance policy requires analysis to comprehend its scope does not mean it is ambiguous. Hess......
-
Friar v. Statutory Trustees of Kirkwood Sports Ass'n, Inc., s. 71875
...for or participating in any contest or exhibition of an athletic or sports nature....") Id. at 1389-90; Morrison Assurance Co. v. City of Opa-Locka, 389 So.2d 1079 (Fla.App.1980) (softball player injured while practicing for a game when she fell over a wheelbarrow left near a softball diamo......
-
Jefferson Ins. Co. of New York v. Sea World of Florida, Inc., 90-2179
...Board of Suwannee County ); Town of Surfside v. Morrison Assurance Co., 394 So.2d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Morrison Assurance Co. v. City of Opa-Locka, 389 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The purpose of exclusions such as the one in Jefferson's policy is to except from liability coverage the ......