Morse, Matter of
| Decision Date | 07 May 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. S95Y0168,S95Y0168 |
| Citation | 470 S.E.2d 232,266 Ga. 652 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Jack O. MORSE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
William P. Smith, III, General Counsel, Cynthia Carol Hinrichs, Asst. Gen. Counsel, State Bar of Georgia, Atlanta, for the State Bar.
James E. Spence, Jr., Decatur, for Morse.
This court previously held that Jack O. Morse violated Standards 4, 22(b), and 45 of State Bar Rule 4-102 and remanded to the Review Panel of the State Disciplinary Board for a recommended punishment. 1 1 By a divided vote, the review panel recommended that Morse receive a public reprimand. Since Morse has exhibited a pattern of repeated disregard of the disciplinary standards, we reject that recommendation and order his suspension from the practice of law in Georgia.
Like the review panel, we look to the American Bar Association's standards for guidance in determining the appropriate sanction to impose. 2 Among the factors to consider are the duty violated, the lawyer's mental state, the injury caused by the lawyer's misconduct, and the existence of aggravating and mitigating factors.
In the first disciplinary action, Morse violated Standard 22(b) by failing to return his client's papers for 10 months and attaching an attorney's lien to her claim without providing documentary support. He did not release the file or lien until the client filed a grievance with the State Bar. His actions violated his duty to his client to act diligently and his duty to the legal profession to properly withdraw from representation. The review panel concluded that Morse acted intentionally. His actions forced another attorney to reconstruct the client's file and caused a substantial delay in his former client's receipt of settlement proceeds.
In the second action, Morse violated Standard 4 when he asked a client to sign an agreement settling a worker's compensation claim without explaining the legal effect of the agreement and violated Standard 45(b) by knowingly making a false statement that he had witnessed the signing of a settlement agreement when the client, in fact, never signed the agreement. These actions violated Morse's duty as a lawyer to the legal system, although the review panel found no evidence of intentional misconduct or harm to the client.
We find that the key factor in determining the appropriate punishment in these two actions is the aggravating factor of Morse's prior disciplinary offenses. In 1993, Morse received review panel reprimands for failing to respond to the investigative panel concerning allegations in two separate matters and for using runners to solicit clients and sharing legal fees with non-lawyers in a third action. Although his infractions here differ, they do demonstrate a general pattern of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Palazzola
...Imposing Lawyer Sanctions for guidance in determining the appropriate punishment for Palazzola's misconduct. See In the Matter of Morse , 266 Ga. 652, 653, 470 S.E.2d 232 (1996). The Special Master explained that because Palazzola's conduct in regard to his violations of Rules 1.16 (d), 7.1......
-
In re Lain
...Imposing Lawyers Sanctions ("ABA Standards") for guidance in determining punishment in disciplinary cases. See In the Matter of Morse , 266 Ga. 652, 653, 470 S.E.2d 232 (1996). The Special Master noted that the rules violated by Lain prescribe and proscribe some of the most important obliga......
-
In re Hunt, S19Y0099
...level of discipline. See In the Matter of Morse, 265 Ga. 353, 354, 456 S.E.2d 52 (1995) ( Morse I ); In the Matter of Morse, 266 Ga. 652, 653, 470 S.E.2d 232 (1996) ( Morse II ). ABA Standard 4.1, which addresses failure to safeguard client property, applies to violations of Rules 1.15 (I) ......
-
In re Jefferson
...the special master considered the American Bar Association Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions, see In the Matter of Morse , 266 Ga. 652, 653, 470 S.E.2d 232 (1996), and found that the presumptive sanction for her conduct was disbarment. The special master also found the following aggra......
-
Legal Ethics - Roy M. Sobelson
...association standards for imposing lawyer sanctions (1991 ed.). See, e.g., In re Lyles, 266 Ga. 668, 469 S.E.2d 670 (1996); In re Morse, 266 Ga. 652,470 S.E.2d 232 (1996); In re Robinson, 266 Ga. 636, 469 S.E.2d 190 (1996). 87. 220 Ga. App. 690, 469 S.E.2d 443 (1996). 88. The case was event......
-
The Lawyer's Duty of Tech Competence Post-covid: Why Georgia Needs a New Professional Rule Now—more Than Ever
...of Ga. 2021).119. Id. r. 1.6(b).120. Id. r. 1.6(c).121. ABA Comm. on Ethics & Pro. Resp., Formal Op. 498, at 3 (2021).122. In re Morse, 470 S.E.2d 232, 232 (Ga. 1996); see Ga. Rules of Pro. Conduct r. 4-102(c) (State Bar of Ga. 2021). See generally Standards for Imposing Law. Sanctions (Am.......