Morse v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., Ltd.

Decision Date27 February 1975
Citation323 N.E.2d 769,3 Mass.App.Ct. 712
PartiesMae F. MORSE v. The EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION, LTD.
CourtAppeals Court of Massachusetts

John Arthur Johnson, Boston, for defendant.

William D. Barry, Medford, for plaintiff.

Before HALE, C.J., and ROSE, and KEVILLE, JJ.

RESCRIPT.

This is a bill to reach and apply a liability insurance policy written by the defendant in satisfaction of a judgment previously obtained against the insured, Brenner's Department Store, Inc. (the Store), by reason of an accident on the Store's premises on May 7, 1969, in which the plaintiff was injured. In its appeal from the final decree of the Superior Court for the plaintiff, the defendant challenges the finding of the trial judge that the Store had notified the defendant of the plaintiff's claim 'as soon as practicable' in accordance with the terms of the policy. The plaintiff, whose rights are derivative from those of the Store and subject to any defense available to the defendant against the Store (Polito v. Galluzzo, 337 Mass. 360, 363, 149 N.E.2d 375 (1958)), had the burden of proving that the defendant had been given such notice. Segal v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 337 Mass. 185, 187, 148 N.E.2d 659 (1958). The judge found that letters notifying the Store of the plaintiff's claim, mailed respectively on or about May 14 and June 26, 1969, had been duly received by the Store, and neither party questions the propriety of that finding, which was plainly correct. Hobart-Farrell Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Klayman, 302 Mass. 508, 509, 19 N.E.2d 805 (1939). Federal Ins. Co. v. Summers, 403 F.2d 971, 975 (1st Cir. 1968). However, it was error for him to find that the Store had forwarded those letters to the defendant 'in the normal course of business,' as there was no evidence that the letters had been mailed to the defendant by any person on behalf of the Store (contrast Anderson v. Billerica, 309 Mass. 516, 36 N.E.2d 393 (1941)), nor any evidence that any such person had even seen the letters or acted upon them in any way whatsoever (see Schneider v. Boston Elev. Ry., 259 Mass. 564, 566, 156 N.E. 734 (1927); compare Leasing Associates, Inc. v. Slaughter & Son, Inc., 450 F.2d 174, 180 (8th Cir. 1971); contrast Prudential Trust Co. v. Hayes, 247 Mass. 311, 313--315, 142 N.E. 73 (1924); Meehan v. North Adams Sav. Bank, 302 Mass. 357, 363--364, 19 N.E.2d 299 (1939)). The earliest notice of the plaintiff's claim to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Royal-Globe Ins. Co. v. Craven, ROYAL-GLOBE
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 14 Enero 1992
    ..."warranted, if not required [as matter of law]"). The Appeals Court has similarly held. Cf., e.g., Morse v. Employers Liab. Assurance Corp., Ltd., 3 Mass.App.Ct. 712, 323 N.E.2d 769 (1975) (three months and two weeks not "as soon as practicable"); Powell v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., supra at......
  • Palermo v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • 6 Marzo 1997
    ...753 (1968); and who derivatively stands in the shoes of the Frews in the reach and apply action, see Morse v. Employers' Liab. Assur. Corp., 3 Mass.App.Ct. 712, 323 N.E.2d 769 (1975)--is entitled to the benefits of Fireman's discharge of that Accordingly, so much of the judgment as dismisse......
  • Granite State Minerals, Inc. v. American Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • 21 Julio 1977
    ...Potter v. Great American Indemnity Co. of N.Y., 316 Mass. 155, 55 N.E.2d 198 (1944). And see Morse v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp., 323 N.E.2d 769 (Mass.App.1975) (under policy provision requiring notice "as soon as practicable," a delay of two and a half months by insured in giving......
  • Financial Acceptance Corp. v. Garvey
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • 6 Octubre 1978
    ...together with any inferences that may properly be drawn therefrom, support the judgment. Silverman v. Silverman, --- Mass.App. --- A, 323 N.E.2d 769 (1977). See O'Brien v. Dwight, 363 Mass. 256, 281-282, 294 N.E.2d 363 (1973). See generally BILLS V. NUNNO, --- MASS.APP., ---, --- - --- , 34......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • CHAPTER 10 ISSUES IN INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Environmental Considerations in Natural Resource and Real Property Transactions (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...and not upon the receipt of a suit or demand by the injured party. See, Sohm, supra; Morse v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp., Ltd., 323 N.E.2d 769 (Mass. App. 1975). 2. Persons That Should Receive Notice In cases arising from environmental contamination, the insured should carefully a......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT