Mosher v. Murphy
Decision Date | 20 November 1876 |
Parties | Augustus Mosher v. Timothy C. Murphy |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Bristol. Contract on the following bond executed by John Doherty, as principal, and by Dennis Garvey and the defendant, as sureties:
The case was submitted to the Superior Court, and, after judgment for the plaintiff, to this court on appeal, on an agreed statement of facts, in substance as follows:
The attachment in the action mentioned in the bond was by the trustee process, in which the Fall River Bleachery was summoned as trustee of John Doherty. The bond was signed voluntarily by the defendant, and, upon the acceptance of the bond by the plaintiff, the trustee was discharged and the attachment dissolved voluntarily. Judgment was recovered against Doherty, and execution issued on the judgment. Doherty neglected to satisfy the execution and judgment within thirty days after recovery of judgment, and continued so to do.
If the defendant was liable, judgment was to be entered for the plaintiff for the amount of judgment and interest; otherwise, judgment for the defendant.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
A. N. Lincoln, for the plaintiff.
H. K. Braley, for the defendant.
OPINION
The St. of 1875, c. 68, § 2, declares that no bond shall be given to dissolve an attachment, which does not contain a condition obliging the sureties to pay the special judgment, which by the first section is provided for, in order to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hanscom v. Malden & Melrose Gaslight Co.
...to dissolve attachment, and becomes bankrupt, Fickett v. Durham, 119 Mass. 159; Barnstable Sav. Bank v. Higgins, 124 Mass. 115; Mosher v. Murphy, 121 Mass. 276; removal of in personal injury suits of traveling on the Lord's Day, Bucher v. Fitchburg R. R. Co., 131 Mass. 156, 41 Am.Rep. 216; ......
-
Castaline v. Swardlick
...in strict conformity to requirements of a statute may be enforced as a bond at common law. Holbrook v. Klenert, 113 Mass. 268;Mosher v. Murphy, 121 Mass. 276. [3][4] The words of the ordinary statutes of limitations are that the actions of the several kinds described ‘shall be commenced onl......
-
Massasoit-Pocasset Nat. Bank v. Borden
...not made in the mode provided by the statute under which it purports to have been given, Bank of Brighton v. Smith, 5 Allen, 413;Mosher v. Murphy, 121 Mass. 276;Pray v. Wasdell, 146 Mass. 324, 16 N. E. 266;Farr v. Rouillard, 172 Mass. 303, 52 N. E. 443;Howe v. Grimes, 211 Mass. 33, 97 N. E.......
-
Fazzano v. Martin
...same result by voluntary mutual agreement. Robertson & Govanne Const. Co. v. AEtna Acc. & Liab. Co., 91 Conn. 129, 99 A. 557; Mosher v. Murphy, 121 Mass. 276, 278. That the bond is not in the form prescribed for proceedings under the statute (Revised Statutes, § 5888) is therefore without o......