Mott v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of World

Citation244 S.W. 733,155 Ark. 259
Decision Date16 October 1922
Docket Number199
PartiesMOTT v. SOVEREIGN CAMP WOODMEN OF THE WORLD
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Appeal from Yell Circuit Court, Dardanelle District; A. B. Priddy Judge; affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

R A. Sandlin and Wilson & Chambers, for appellant.

The court erred in directing a verdict for the appellee. 89 Ark 368; 100 Id. 71; 104 Id. 267; 105 Id. 526; 107 Id. 158; 145 Ark. 408.

The burden of proof was on appellee to establish suicide. 133 Ark. 176. Before it was entitled to an instructed verdict it would have to establish to a reasonable certainty that deceased could not have met his death by accident or the act of a third party. Bacon's Life & Acc. Ins. (4th ed.) sec. 438; 230 S.W. 369. Appellee's proof is entirely circumstantial. There is a presumption against suicide. 80 Ark. 190; 19 A. & E. Enc. Law 77; 127 U.S. 661; 73 F. 444.

The case at bar is stronger from the facts and circumstances that the deceased did not commit suicide than any of the following: 221 S.W. 858; 128 Ark. 155; 213 S.W. 45; 215 S.W. 265; 201 S.W. 1128; 232 S.W. 708.

T. E. Helm, for appellee.

The cases relied on by appellant may be differentiated from the present one on the facts.

There was only one reasonable conclusion to be drawn from the evidence in this case and that was that deceased committed suicide, and it was the duty of the court to direct a verdict for appellee. 19 A. & E. Enc. Law. 77; 25 Cyc. 951; 4 Cooley's Briefs on Law of Ins. 3264; see also sec. 3269; 204 P. 523.

The undisputed facts establishing a case of suicide here, it would have been error to submit the case to a jury. 95 Ark. 456.

SMITH, J. HUMPHREYS, J., dissenting.

OPINION

SMITH, J.

Appellant sued to recover as beneficiary in a policy of insurance on the life of her son, W. R. Mott. The policy contained a provision that there should be no liability if the insured committed suicide, whether sane or insane, and the insurance company defended on the ground that the insured committed suicide. There was a directed verdict in favor of the insurance company, from which is this appeal.

The insurance company assumed the burden, which the law imposed on it, of showing that the insured died by his own hand. The insured's throat was cut, and this was the cause of his death. No one actually saw the wound inflicted, but the insurance company claims that the facts and circumstances are such that no other inference can fairly and reasonably be drawn than that the insured committed suicide, and it contends therefore that the verdict was properly directed in its favor.

The facts are as follows: Mott, the insured, was twenty-two years old, and enlisted in the regular army and was assigned to the Ninth Recruit Company at Fort Logan, Colorado. He became ill and was sent to the army hospital. The physician who had his case in charge testified that Mott had a temperature of 102, and was laboring under the insane delusion of having committed several robberies. One of the crimes which he thought he had committed was that of bank robbery with the assistance of his brother. He thought his brother assisted him in the commission of the crime and had refused to divide the spoils, and was threatening to turn him over to the civil authorities. The physician further testified that Mott bought, on the day of his death, a safety razor from a fellow soldier. Witness was notified about 4:10 in the afternoon of July 4th that Mott had killed himself. He reported to the hospital at once, and found the body of Mott on a bed in the medical ward, covered by a sheet. On examination he found an incision through all the tissues of the lower portion of the neck, including the trachea, and the carotid artery was found severed. The incision was about five inches long. Witness arrived about 4:20 and found deceased had been dead about ten minutes. He stated that, from the evidences before him, it was very clear that the patient had killed himself by the use of a safety-razor blade. He stated the temperature of the patient was not sufficient to produce delirium. With the accompanying symptoms which he had, and from the untruthfulness of the patient's statements as to his acts, witness was of opinion that the patient had become insane.

A Miss Fox, who was a trained nurse in the surgical ward, testified that she was on duty at the time Mott killed himself. She was not regularly in charge of the medical ward, but on the day in question was giving that ward attention, as the nurse in charge was not feeling well. She testified that a few minutes after four she entered the end of the ward in which Mott was confined. This was a large ward and had, perhaps, twenty beds in it. Mott's bed was about three or four beds from the end at which she entered the ward, and he was lying on his bed as she walked through the ward, and was the only patient in the ward. Witness walked on out of the door at the far end of the ward on to a porch. About the time she reached this porch or very shortly afterwards she heard a noise which was probably occasioned by Mott falling out of bed. She listened, and presently heard a peculiar noise like some one breathing hard. She then rushed back into the hospital and found Mott lying on his stomach in a pool of blood. She was accompanied back into the ward by the nurse in charge thereof, and who had been standing out on the porch where witness was when she heard the sounds within which attracted her attention. This nurse reached the body a few seconds after witness did, and they put him in his bed, and noticed a deep cut across his throat, from which blood was flowing freely. The patient died in three or four minutes after she reached his body. When she first found the patient, he was lying in a pool of blood, and in this pool was a safety-razor blade. She stated that only a very short interval elapsed between the time she saw the patient lying on his bed as she walked through the ward and her return to it.

In rebuttal testimony was offered to the effect that Mott had long desired to enlist in the army, and was satisfied with his condition there; and an...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Watkins v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 23 Abril 1923
    ... ... introducing it. See Sov. Camp W. O. W. v ... Richardson, 151 Ark. 231, 236 S.W. 278 ... O. U. W. v ... Mode, 157 Ark. 62, 247 S.W. 386; Mott ... ...
  • CROME v. Travelers Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 16 Febrero 1926
    ...Voelkel v. Supreme Tent, etc., 92 N. W. 1104, 116 Wis. 202; Bernick v. Illinois, etc., Ass'n, 175 Ill. App. 511; Mott v. Sovereign Camp, etc., 244 S. W. 733, 155 Ark. 259; Fletcher v. Sovereign Camp, etc., 32 So. 923, 81 Miss. 249; Felix v. Fidelity, etc., Co., 64 A. 903, 216 Pa. 95; Skala ......
  • Tippets v. Gem State Mut. Life Ass'n, Inc.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 15 Junio 1966
    ...the presumption against suicide:ARKANSAS:Industrial Mut. Indem. Co. v. Watt, 95 Ark. 456, 130 S.W. 532 (1910).Mott v. Sovereign Camp, W.O.W., 155 Ark. 259, 244 S.W. 733 (1922).New York L. Ins. Co. v. Watters, 154 Ark. 569, 243 S.W. 831 (1922).Aetna L. Ins. Co. v. Alsobrook, 175 Ark. 523, 29......
  • Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. De Johnson, Civil 2897
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • 14 Abril 1930
    ... ... Fletcher, 78 Miss. 377, 28 ... So. 872, 29 So. 523; Mott v. Sovereign ... Camp, W.O.W., 155 Ark. 259, 244 S.W. 733; ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT