Murray v. State, 52632

Decision Date09 September 1981
Docket NumberNo. 52632,52632
Citation403 So.2d 149
PartiesDwayne MURRAY v. STATE of Mississippi.
CourtMississippi Supreme Court

Carver A. Randle, Indianola, for appellant.

Bill Allain, Atty. Gen. by Karen Gilfoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and LEE and HAWKINS, JJ.

HAWKINS, Justice, for the Court:

Hezeki Cathey and the appellant Dwayne Murray were indicted by the grand jury of Sunflower County on a charge of aggravated assault upon Willie Winters, a corrections officer with the Mississippi Department of Corrections at Parchman. 1 From this conviction and sentence of 15 years with 5 years suspended by the circuit court of that county, Murray has perfected this appeal.

On February 3, 1980, Cathey and the appellant Murray were inmates at the Mississippi Department of Corrections in Parchman, housed in C Unit of Camp 24.

At approximately 10 minutes before 9:00 o'clock that evening, officers Willie L. Winters and Frank Grammer were sitting at a desk in the day room, a large central control area, designated as Zone 5. Zone 5 was surrounded by four quarter areas, designated respectively as Zones 1, 2, 3 and 4, and separated by a glass partition, enabling the officers to view all zones. Metal partitions separated the remaining zones. The door to Zone 1 was used by the officers to enter the day room, and this door was not locked. The doors from the day room to the other zones were locked.

Cathey was in the Zone 2 area and knocked on the window or door, attracting the officers attention. When Cathey told him he wanted to go to another zone and write a letter, Officer Grammer unlocked the door.

While the officers attention was thus diverted, Murray, who was in Zone 1, came through the unlocked door, armed with a "shank" and grabbed Officer Winters. During this time Cathey, also armed with a shank, grabbed Officer Grammer. A "shank" is a homemade weapon of sharpened steel, apparently on the order of a spike, about the size of a sharpened pencil.

Murray then pulled Officer Winters away from the desk, and with the shank at his throat told him, "Officer, I want the keys. Lay on the floor and give me the keys." Murray wanted the zone door keys in Officer Winters' back pocket, and Murray told him to turn over. Winters did as he was told, and Murray, still holding the shank on him, removed Winters' keys.

After Murray got the keys, he went to Zone 4 and attempted without success to unlock the door. Still threatening Winters with the shank, Murray handed the keys to Winters and told him to open the door. Winters did so and Murray told the inmates to come out.

Winters and Murray then unlocked the Zone 3 door and walked to Cell 41 confining one Shelby Myers, and Murray told Myers to come out. Myers remained, and Winters and Murray proceeded to Cell 39, which was vacant. Murray left Winters there and returned to Zone 5, the day room.

During this time another inmate, Theodore Fields, acting as peacemaker, kept telling Murray not to hurt Winters. He also told Murray and Cathey, "This is not going to work; let the officer go." The other inmates, though curious, did not participate in any of this conduct.

Fields, Cathey and Officer Grammer then got Winters out of Cell 39, and they all went to Zone 5. Murray was no longer threatening anyone, and the officers were told to call the administrator, the warden, the commissioner, and the governor. Cathey then surrendered his shank to Grammer, and a few minutes later Murray also surrendered his.

Officer Winters said Murray never touched him with the shank, and testified as follows:

Q. Did he (Murray) at any time harm you or attempt to harm you?

A. No more than hold the shank on me.

Q. Just held it on you?

A. He stated that if I gave him the keys in the beginning that I wouldn't be hurt, and so I gave him the keys.

Officer Winters testified further:

Q. Did you ever try to talk to him at the time he allegedly held the shank on you?

A. No, I didn't. I couldn't talk to him I didn't try to talk to him because he had his mind set on give him the keys and it wasn't anything going to happen to me, so I gave him the keys.

Murray did not testify. Cathey did, however, and the only reason for this conduct by these inmates came from Cathey, who testified that there was some problem with heating and plumbing, for which they wanted some attention.

Prior to trial the defendant filed a written motion to reduce the charge against him from aggravated assault to simple assault, which was overruled.

When the State rested, Murray's counsel moved for a directed verdict, assigning the State had failed to prove the elements of the crime for which Murray was charged. This motion was overruled, was not renewed when both sides rested, and no request for a peremptory instruction was filed. The jury returned a guilty verdict of aggravated assault, the only issue submitted to it, and the circuit judge sentenced Murray to a term of 15 years, with 5 years suspended.

A motion for a new trial on the ground of insufficiency of the evidence was overruled, and this appeal has been taken. The only error assigned states that the trial court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. The brief of appellant does not contain a single citation of legal authority, and is of no benefit whatever to appellant or this Court. In the ordinary civil case such a brief submitted by appellant's counsel would result in an affirmance of the lower court.

In 1974, the Legislature revised the statutory crimes of assault and assault and battery. 1974 Miss. Laws, Ch. 458 (codified in Mississippi Code Annotated § 97-3-7 (Supp. 1980)). The first paragraph of this act defines simple assault and provides the punishment therefor. The pertinent portions read as follows:

(1) A person is guilty of simple assault if he ... (c) attempts by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily harm; ... a person convicted of simple assault upon a law enforcement officer ... while such law enforcement officer ... is acting within the scope of his duty and office shall be punished by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or by imprisonment for not more than five (5) years, or both.

The second paragraph of the act deals with aggravated assault and the punishment therefor, the pertinent portions of which read as follows:

(2) A person is guilty of aggravated assault if he ... (b) attempts to cause ... bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon or other means likely to produce death or serious bodily harm; ... a person convicted of aggravated assault upon a law enforcement officer ... while such law enforcement officer ... is acting within the scope of his duty and office shall be...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Burney v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • November 18, 1987
    ...crime; 2) a direct ineffectual act done toward its commission, and 3) the failure to consummate its commission. Murray v. State, 403 So.2d 149, 152 (Miss.1981); Bucklew v. State, 206 So.2d 200, 202 (Miss.1968). Mr. Burney argues that the state failed to prove intent because when Mr. White o......
  • Gibson v. State, 92-KA-00166-SCT
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • July 20, 1995
    ...thing, and some actual overt effort to put the intent into effect." Brown v. State, 633 So.2d 1042 (Miss.1994) citing Murray v. State, 403 So.2d 149, 152 (Miss.1981); Williams v. State, 209 Miss. 902, 48 So.2d 598 (1950); Dill v. State, 149 Miss. 167, 115 So. 203 (1928); Wiggington v. State......
  • Lee v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 13, 1985
    ..."attempted by physical menace to put another in fear of imminent serious bodily harm." The point is largely controlled by Murray v. State, 403 So.2d 149 (Miss.1981). In the course of an abortive escape attempt from the Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman, Dwayne Murray held a prison ......
  • Carter v. State, No. 2004-KA-01639-COA.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Court of Appeals
    • January 31, 2006
    ...courts interpret "attempt" to mean the intent to do something, and some actual effort to put the intent into effect. Murray v. State, 403 So.2d 149, 152 (Miss. 1981). The "gravamen" of the offense of an attempt to commit a crime is found in the statutory requirement that an overt act toward......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT