Myers v. Schiering, 70-370

Decision Date30 June 1971
Docket NumberNo. 70-370,70-370
Citation271 N.E.2d 864,27 Ohio St.2d 11
Parties, 56 O.O.2d 6 MYERS, Appellee, v. SCHIERING, Auditor, City of Fairfield, Maupin, Appellant.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court

1. Under Section 1f of Article II of the Ohio Constitution, municipal referendum powers are limited to questions which municipalities are 'authorized by law to control by legislative action.'

2. The passage by a city council of a resolution granting a permit for the operation of a sanitary landfill, pursuant to an existing zoning regulation, constitutes administrative action and is not subject to referendum proceedings.

The city council of the city of Fairfield adopted a resolution providing for the granting of a permit 'for the use of a part of Lot No. 62 in the city of Fairfield * * * for the purposes of operating a sanitary landfill.'

A referendum petition was filed with the city auditor requesting him to certify the resolution to the county board of elections for the purpose of submitting the resolution to the electors at the next general election.

Plaintiff-appellee, Elmer Myers, filed an action in the Court of Common Pleas to enjoin the city auditor from certifying the resolution to the board of elections.

The cause was submitted to the trial court on motions for summary judgment by plaintiff and defendnat. That court found in favor of plaintiff and granted an order restraining the city auditor from certifying the referendum petition to the board of elections.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment, and the cause is before this court following the allowance of a motion to certify the record.

Maxwell N. Wear, Fairfield, for appellee.

Carl Morgenstern, Hamilton, for appellant.

C. WILLIAM O'NEILL, Chief Justice.

The issue to be decided in this appeal is whether the resolution granting the permit for the operation of the sanitary landfill is subject to referendum proceedings.

It is appellant's position that, pursuant to Section 1f of Article II of the Ohio Constitution, and R.C. § 731.29 and § 731.30, the resolution is subject to referendum.

Section 1f of Article II reads:

'The initiative and referendum powers are hereby reserved to the people of each municipality on all questions which such municipalities may now or hereafter be authorized by law to control by legislative action; such powers shall be exercised in the manner now or hereafter provided by law.' (Emphasis added.)

R.C. § 731.29 provides, in part:

'Any ordinance or other measure passed by the legislative authority of a municipal corporation shall be subject to the referendum except as provided by section 731.30 of the Revised Code. * * *'

R.C. § 731.30 provides exceptions as follows:

'Whenever the legislative authority of a municipal corporation is required to pass more than one ordinance or other measure to complete the legislation necessary to make and pay for any public improvement, sections 731.28 to 731.41, inclusive, of the Revised Code shall apply only to the first ordinance or other measure required to be passed and not to any subsequent ordinances and other measures relating thereto. Ordinances or other measures providing for appropriations for the current expenses of any municipal corporation, or for street improvements petitioned for by the owners of a majority of the feet front of the property benefited and to be especially assessed for the cost thereof, and emergency ordinances or measures necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety in such municipal corporation, shall go into immediate effect. Such emergency ordinances or measures must, upon a yea and nay vote, receive a two-thirds vote of all the members elected to the legislative authority, and the reasons for such necessity shall be set forth in one section of the ordinance or other measure.'

Although Section 1f of Article II of the Constitution specifies that referendum is applicable only to questions which municipalities are 'authorized by law to control by ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Ctr. for Powell Crossing, LLC v. City of Powell, Case No: 2:14-cv-2207
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • March 25, 2016
    ...and initiative power to questions the municipality is “authorized by law to control by legislative action.” SeeMyers v. Schiering, 27 Ohio St.2d 11, 271 N.E.2d 864 (1971), paragraph one of the syllabus. Because citizens of a municipality cannot exercise referendum powers greater than what t......
  • Beiersdorfer v. Larose
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • August 20, 2021
    ... ... N. Main St. Coal. v. Webb , 835 N.E.2d ... 1222, 1226 (Ohio 2005); Myers v. Schiering , 271 ... N.E.2d 864, 864 (Ohio 1971) ... [ 4 ] But if the secretary ... ...
  • Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga Falls
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • May 6, 1998
    ...the site plan consisted, generally, of executing and administering a zoning law previously enacted. See Myers v. Schiering (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 11, 56 O.O.2d 6, 271 N.E.2d 864, and State ex rel. Srovnal v. Linton (1976), 46 Ohio St.2d 207, 75 O.O.2d 241, 346 N.E.2d 764. However, we disagre......
  • Forest City Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Eastlake, 73-901
    • United States
    • Ohio Supreme Court
    • March 19, 1975
    ...which municipalities are 'authorized by law to control by legislative action.' (Paragraph one of the syllabus in Myers v. Schiering, 27 Ohio St.2d 11, 271 N.E.2d 864, approved and 2. A municipal charter provision, which requires that any ordinance changing land use be ratified by the voters......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Reconsidering the use of direct democracy in making land use decisions.
    • United States
    • UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy Vol. 19 No. 2, December 2001
    • December 22, 2001
    ...of city council regardless of whether such actions are administrative or legislative in nature."). (22.) See, e.g., Myers v. Schiering, 271 N.E.2d 864, 866 (Ohio 1971.) ("[T]he passage by a city council of a resolution granting a permit for the operation of a sanitary landfill, pursuant to ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT