Nachon Enterprises Inc. v. Alexdex Corp., 92-1456
Decision Date | 09 March 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 92-1456,92-1456 |
Citation | 615 So.2d 245 |
Parties | 18 Fla. L. Week. D678 NACHON ENTERPRISES INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. ALEXDEX CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Pedro F. Martell, Coral Gables, for appellant.
Richard J. Burton & Associates and Richard J. Burton, Dania, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.
In this action to foreclose a construction lien in the amount of $4,140.44, we find that the lienor properly filed the foreclosure action in County Court, and thus it was error for the Circuit Court to discharge the lien.
In 1991, appellant Nachon Enterprises filed a notice of lis pendens to establish and foreclose a construction lien, against appellee Alexdex Corporation's property, in the civil division of the County Court. Alexdex responded with a complaint to show cause and to discharge the lien, which was filed in the Circuit Court. Nachon then filed a Motion to Dismiss Alexdex's complaint in the Circuit Court setting forth the fact that Nachon had already timely instituted a foreclosure action in the County Court. Despite the foregoing, in June of 1992, the Circuit Court granted Alexdex's Motion to Discharge the lien based upon the ground that Nachon had not properly responded to the Show Cause Action.
Florida's lien laws, Chapter 713, are an abrogation of the common law, and are to be strictly construed, as well as strictly applied. See Krasne-Gold Coast Joint Venture v. Allied Drywall, Inc., 573 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Goldberger v. United Plumbing and Heating, Inc., 358 So.2d 860 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Wesley Constr. Co. v. Yarnell, 268 So.2d 454 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). Section 713.22(1) provides that a lien is not enforceable after one year from the recording of the claim of lien "unless within that time an action to enforce the lien is commenced in a court of competent jurisdiction." Effective October 1, 1990, the legislature promulgated Section 34.01(4) which specifically states that:
Judges of county courts may hear all matters in equity involved in any case within the jurisdictional amount of the county court, except as otherwise restricted by the State Constitution or the laws of Florida.
Pursuant to this Section, a "court of competent jurisdiction" to hear foreclosure actions, which are equitable in nature, now includes the County Court. Unlike an action to quiet title, which is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Circuit Court, see Sec. 26.012(2)(g), Fla.Stat. (1991), the foreclosure action at issue here is not an action "involving the title and boundaries of real property." See also Spector v. Old Town Key West Development, Ltd., 567 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (, )review denied, 577 So.2d 1327 (Fla.1991); Kugeares v. Casino, Inc., 372 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979) ( ); Williams v. Gund, 334 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976) ( ). ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Johnson v. Am. First Fed., Inc.
...the applicability of Alexdex Corporation v. Nachon Enterprises, Inc., 641 So.2d 858 (Fla.1994) ( reviewing Nachon Enterprises, Inc. v. Alexdex Corp., 615 So.2d 245 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)). In Alexdex, the supreme court addressed whether circuit courts had jurisdiction to foreclose a lien on rea......
-
Miami Stage Lighting, Inc. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.
... ... See also Hertz Corp. v. Pugh, 354 So.2d 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)(lessee agrees ... ...
-
Alexdex Corp. v. Nachon Enterprises, Inc.
...CURIAM. Under jurisdiction granted to us by article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, we review Nachon Enterprises, Inc. v. Alexdex Corp., 615 So.2d 245 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), because of its conflict with Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Cheesbro Roofing, Inc., 502 So.2d 484 (Fla. 5th DCA......
-
Brooks v. Ocean Village Condominium Ass'n, Inc.
...jurisdiction' to hear foreclosure actions, which are equitable in nature, now includes the County Court." Nachon Enterprises, Inc. v. Alexdex Corp., 615 So.2d 245, 246 (Fla. 3d DCA), review granted, 626 So.2d 203 (Fla.1993). In so holding this court impliedly agreed with the rationale of Sp......