Nasca v. Town of Brookhaven
Decision Date | 16 August 2004 |
Docket Number | 2004-00329. |
Citation | 2004 NY Slip Op 06360,10 A.D.3d 415,781 N.Y.S.2d 137 |
Parties | DEAN NASCA et al., Respondents, v. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN et al., Appellants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto directing a continuation of the hearing pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h and adding to the end of the first decretal paragraph the words "with leave to renew if either plaintiff continues to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination by refusing to answer any material question"; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The notice of claim provisions of the General Municipal Law were enacted to enable municipalities "to pass upon the merits of a claim before the initiation of litigation and thereby forestall unnecessary lawsuits" (Alford v City of New York, 115 AD2d 420, 421 [1985], affd in part, dismissed in part, 67 NY2d 1019 [1986], citing Fourth Report of the Joint Legislative Committee on Municipal Tort Liability, 42 NY Legis Docs 24 [1959]). The purpose of General Municipal Law § 50-h is to enable a municipality to make a prompt investigation of the circumstances of a claim by examining the claimant about the facts of the claim (see Wallace v City of New York, 126 Misc 2d 56, 57 [1984]).
The complaint alleges, inter alia, at least two separate instances of trespass upon the plaintiffs' premises located at Port Jefferson Station, New York. At the hearing pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h, the plaintiffs invoked their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and refused to answer several questions propounded by the defendants regarding the use and occupancy of the subject premises and whether the plaintiffs or other persons resided there.
"The privilege against self incrimination was intended to be used solely as a shield, and thus a plaintiff cannot use it as a sword to harass a defendant and to effectively thwart any attempt by def...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Igoe v. Apple, 1055–16
...investigation of the circumstances of a claim by examining the claimant about the facts of the claim" ( Nasca v. Town of Brookhaven , 10 A.D.3d 415, 416, 781 N.Y.S.2d 137 [2d Dept. 2004] ). Therefore, "[a] party who has failed to comply with a demand for examination pursuant to [GML] § 50–h......
-
Colon v. Martin
...investigation of the circumstances of a claim by examining the claimant about the facts of the claim (see Nasca v. Town of Brookhaven, 10 A.D.3d 415, 416, 781 N.Y.S.2d 137 ). The oral examination of a claimant pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-h serves to supplement the notice of claim......
-
Rodriguez v. Brooklyn Pub. Library
...Inc. v. Village of Ellenville, 41 N.Y.2d 521, 524, 393 N.Y.S.2d 972, 362 N.E.2d 604 [1977] ). ( See Nasca v. Town of Brookhaven, 10 A.D.3d 415, 416, 781 N.Y.S.2d 137 [2d Dept. 2004]; Alford v. City of New York, 115 A.D.2d 420, 421, 496 N.Y.S.2d 224 [1st Dept. 1985]; Matter of Crespo, 123 Mi......
-
Small v. DMRJ Grp.
...and necessary to their defense by invoking the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination"]; Nasca v Town of Brookhaven, 10 A.D.3d 415, 416 [2d Dept 2004] ["Although the plaintiffs have the right to invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination . . . that they ar......
-
Table of cases
...2002), §§ 2:140, 20:30 Narvaez v. City of New York, 83 A.D.3d 516, 922 N.Y.S.2d 12 (1st Dept. 2011), § 18:60 Nasca v. Town of Brookhaven, 10 A.D.3d 415, 781 N.Y.S.2d 137 (2d Dept. 2004), § 7:60 Nassau Ins. Co. v. Murray, 46 N.Y.2d 828, 414 N.Y.S.2d 117 (1978), § 8:20 Natale v. Niagara Mowha......
-
Privileges
...as a sword. Laverne v. Incorporated Vil. of Laurel Hollow, 18 N.Y.2d 635, 272 N.Y.S.2d 780 (2d Dept. 1966); Nasca v. Town of Brookhaven, 10 A.D.3d 415, 781 N.Y.S.2d 137 (2d Dept. 2005). Similarly, invocation of the Fifth Amendment does not relieve a party of its burden to submit evidence to......
-
Privileges
...as a sword. Laverne v. Incorporated Vil. of Laurel Hollow, 18 N.Y.2d 635, 272 N.Y.S.2d 780 (2d Dept. 1966); Nasca v. Town of Brookhaven, 10 A.D.3d 415, 781 N.Y.S.2d 137 (2d Dept. 2005). CAUTION Federal court has recognized inference with nonparty. The United States Court of Appeals for the ......
-
Privileges
...as a sword. Laverne v. Incorporated Vil. of Laurel Hollow, 18 N.Y.2d 635, 272 N.Y.S.2d 780 (2d Dept. 1966); Nasca v. Town of Brookhaven, 10 A.D.3d 415, 781 N.Y.S.2d 137 (2d Dept. 2005). Similarly, invocation of the Fifth Amendment does not relieve a party of its burden to submit evidence to......