National Western Life Ins. Co. v. Walters
Decision Date | 10 December 1968 |
Docket Number | No. 68--528,68--528 |
Citation | 216 So.2d 485 |
Parties | NATIONAL WESTERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, and Robert L. Moody, Appellants, v. David W. WALTERS, Edward N. Moore, and Sarino R. Costanzo, co-partners, d/b/a Walters, Moore & Costanzo, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Street & Greenfield, Miami, for appellants.
Walters, Moore & Costanzo and S. Harvey Ziegler, Miami, for appellees.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C.J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
Appellees (plaintiffs) brought a suit in the trial court seeking recovery of attorneys' fees, alleging a quantum meruit cause of action. The cause proceeded to a jury trial and resulted in a verdict for the defendants. Thereafter, the trial judge granted a new trial upon one ground, as follows:
* * *
* * *
'* * * that it erred in denying plaintiffs' motion for directed verdict on the issue of liability after the defendants stipulated that they had used the attorney-client privilege to prevent the testimony of one of the plaintiffs in another cause, thereby admitting that the plaintiffs were their attorneys, * * *'
The appellants, who had prevailed in the jury verdict, appeal this order and urge error in its entry.
Ordinarily, a trial judge is given a very broad discretion in granting a new trial. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669; Spearman Distributing Company v. Boyette, Fla.App.1968, 205 So.2d 690; Volk v. Goetz, Fla.App.1967, 206 So.2d 250. And, it takes a stronger showing to upset an order granting a new trial than it does an order denying a new trial. Pyms v. Meranda, Fla.1957, 98 So.2d 341; Pemberton v. Keel, Fla.App.1967, 195 So.2d 632; Miles v. Ware, Fla.App.1967, 204 So.2d 524, 525. However, when it is apparent from the ground stated in granting a new trial 1 that the trial judge is acting under an erroneous legal assumption, then it is not a question of discretion but a question of the legal sufficiency of the ground or reason given. Ewing v. Miller, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 889; Nabelski v. Turner, Fla.App.1965, 173 So.2d 729; Boutwell v. Bishop, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 3; Florida Power Corporation v. Smith, Fla.App.1967, 202 So.2d 872.
It is apparent from the order and the record that the trial judge was of the view that the mere invoking of an attorney-client privilege established the right of an attorney to recover a fee. This is not the law. Not every contact with an attorney by a prospective cient will result in an attorney-client relationship, warranting the recovery of the fee, although the relationship may be such as to permit the client to invoke the privilege of attorney-client to prevent the attorney from disclosing what has been revealed to him. Keir v. State, 152 Fla. 389, 11 So.2d 886; In Re Dupont's Estate, 60 Cal.App.2d 276, 140 P.2d 866; Taylor v. Sheldon, 172 Ohio St. 118, 173 N.E.2d 892; Evans v. State, 5 Okl.Cr.R. 643, 115 P. 809, 34 L.R.A., N.S., 577; 8 Wigmore on Evidence (3 Ed.), 587, § 2304. The following is found in the opinion In Re Dupont's Estate, supra:
* * *
* * *
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bishop v. Watson
...the ground or reason for granting the new trial. Boutwell v. Bishop, 194 So.2d 3, 6 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967); National Western Life Ins. Co. v. Watters, 216 So.2d 485 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); City of Hollywood v. Jarkesy, 343 So.2d 886 (Fla. 4th DCA This case was decided by a jury on conflicting evid......
-
Smith v. Vining, s. 79-915
...Inc., 390 So.2d 71 (Fla.2d DCA 1980); City of Hollywood v. Jarkesy, 343 So.2d 886 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); National Western Life Insurance Co. v. Walters, 216 So.2d 485 (Fla.3d DCA 1968). We find no material error in the procedure utilized to reconstruct the record following the removal from th......
-
Springfield Life Ins. Co. v. Edwards, 78-2101
...of the ground or reason for granting the new trial. Boutwell v. Bishop, 194 So.2d 3, 6 (Fla.1st DCA 1967); National Western Life Ins. Co. v. Watters, 216 So.2d 485 (Fla.3d DCA 1968); City of Hollywood v. Jarkesy, 343 So.2d 886 (Fla.4th DCA In this case, we are convinced that the trial judge......
-
La Reina Pharmacy, Inc. v. Lopez, s. 83-2280
...1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (new trial order based on legally insufficient or incorrect grounds reversed); National Western Life Ins. Co. v. Walters, 216 So.2d 485 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) (same). 5 And we find no abuse of discretion in the trial judge's conclusion, which he is uniquely qualified to ......