Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Durane-Bolivard

Decision Date11 September 2019
Docket Number2017–00437,Index No. 6017/14
Parties NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, Respondent, v. Marie DURANE–BOLIVARD, Appellant, et al., Defendants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Law Office of Maggio & Meyer, PLLC, Bohemia, N.Y. (Holly C. Meyer of counsel), for appellant.

Davidson Fink LLP (McGlinchey Stafford, New York, N.Y. [Brian S. McGrath and Mitra Paul Singh ], of counsel), for respondent.

ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., JEFFREY A. COHEN, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Marie Durane–Bolivard appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Thomas A. Adams, J.), entered September 13, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant and dismissing her first, third, and fourth affirmative defenses, and to appoint a referee to compute the amount due to the plaintiff.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order entered September 13, 2016, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the order and judgment of foreclosure and sale in the action (see Matter of Aho , 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248, 383 N.Y.S.2d 285, 347 N.E.2d 647 ). The issues raised on the appeal from the order entered September 13, 2016, are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the order and judgment of foreclosure and sale (see CPLR 5501[a][1] ; Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Durane–Bolivard , ––– A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.3d ––––, 2019 WL 4281868 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2018–05250 ; decided herewith] ).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., COHEN, MALTESE and LASALLE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Durane-Bolivard, 2018–05250
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 11, 2019
    ...of foreclosure and sale brings up for review the order entered September 13, 2016 (see CPLR 5501[a][1] ; Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Durane–Bolivard, 175 A.D.3d 1307, 105 N.Y.S.3d 916 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2017–00437; decided herewith] )."[P]roper service of RPAPL 1304 notice on th......
  • Wright v. Annucci
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 11, 2019
    ...7804(g).In reviewing a prison disciplinary determination, a court's review of the factual findings is limited to ascertaining whether 175 A.D.3d 1307 the determination is supported by substantial evidence (see CPLR 7803[4] ; Matter of Smith v. Annucci, 160 A.D.3d 651, 653, 74 N.Y.S.3d 310 )......
  • Conversano v. Ad Gelato, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 11, 2019
    ...A.D.3d 1242105 N.Y.S.3d 916 (Mem)Robin CONVERSANO, Appellant,v.AD GELATO, INC., et al., Respondents.2018–00759Index No. 17257/14Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.Argued - May 3, 2019September 11, 2019John Breen (Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT