New York and Presbyterian Hospital v. Allstate Insurance Company

Decision Date11 July 2006
Docket Number2006-00190.
Citation31 A.D.3d 512,2006 NY Slip Op 05602,818 N.Y.S.2d 583
PartiesNEW YORK AND PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL et al., Appellants, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the appeal by the plaintiff Mount Vernon Hospital is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that plaintiff is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the defendant's cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the plaintiff New York and Presbyterian Hospital, without costs or disbursements, and the first cause of action is reinstated.

Pursuant to the statutory and regulatory framework governing the payment of no-fault automobile benefits, insurance companies are required to either pay or deny a claim for benefits within 30 days of receipt of the claim (see Insurance Law § 5106 [a]; 11 NYCRR 65-3.8 [c]). However, the 30-day period may be extended where the insurer makes a request for additional information within 15 business days of its receipt of the claim (see 11 NYCRR 65-3.5 [b]; Nyack Hosp. v General Motors Acceptance Corp., 27 AD3d 96, 100 [2005]; Hospital for Joint Diseases v ELRAC, Inc., 11 AD3d 432, 434 [2004]; New York & Presbyt. Hosp. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 5 AD3d 568, 569-570 [2004]), and an insurer is not obligated to pay or deny a claim until all demanded verification is provided (see Nyack Hosp. v General Motors Acceptance Corp., supra at 100-101; Central Suffolk Hosp. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 24 AD3d 492, 493 [2005], lv denied 7 NY3d 704 [2006]).

The plaintiff New York and Presbyterian Hospital (hereinafter the plaintiff) made a prima facie showing that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on its first cause of action by submitting evidence that the prescribed statutory billing forms had been mailed and received, and that the defendant had...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Am. Transit Ins. Co. v. Nexray Med. Imaging PC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • May 28, 2023
    ... ... NY Slip Op 50538(U) American Transit Insurance Company, Petitioner, v. Nexray Medical ... Farrell LLC, New York City (David Fair of counsel), for ... Petrofsky v Allstate Ins. Co. , 54 N.Y.2d 207 [1981]); ... rational ... , 27 ... A.D.3d 96, 100 [2005]; Hospital for Joint Diseases v ... ELRAC, Inc. , 11 A.D.3d ... Presbyterian Hosp. v Maryland Cas. Co., 226 A.D.2d 613; ... ...
  • Elmont Open MRI & Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v. N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New York District Court
    • August 17, 2012
    ...insurer. Westchester Med. Ctr. v. AIG, Inc., 36 A.D.3d 900, 829 N.Y.S.2d 180 (2nd Dept.2007); New York and Presbyterian Hosp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 31 A.D.3d 512, 818 N.Y.S.2d 583 (2nd Dept.2006); and 11 NYCRR 65–3.8(a)(1). The Yamraj affidavit establishes the documents submitted by Elmont ......
  • GBI Acupuncture, P.C. v. Esurance Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Civil Court
    • December 26, 2012
    ...Hosp. v. American Transit Ins. Co., 57 A.D.3d 517, 869 N.Y.S.2d 149 (2nd Dept., 2008); New York & Presbyterian Hosp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 31 A.D.3d 512, 818 N.Y.S.2d 583 (2nd Dept., 2006). Verification extends the time for the insurer to pay or deny a claim by permitting the insurer to dem......
  • Viviane Etienne Med. Care v. Country–wide Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 8, 2011
    ...pay or deny the claim within the requisite 30–day period ( see Insurance Law § 5106[a]; New York & Presbyt. Hosp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 31 A.D.3d 512, 818 N.Y.S.2d 583 [2006]; Mary Immaculate Hosp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 5 A.D.3d 742, 774 N.Y.S.2d 564 [2004]; see also Westchester Med. Ctr. v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT