Newflower Market, Inc. v. Cook
| Decision Date | 29 April 2010 |
| Citation | 229 P.3d 1058 |
| Docket Number | 09CA0956 |
| Parties | NEWFLOWER MARKET, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elizabeth C. COOK, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
26 cases
-
Perez v. Qwest Corp.
...agreement. New Mexico and Colorado courts look to the contract as a whole to interpret its meaning. See Newflower Mkt., Inc. v. Cook, 229 P.3d 1058, 1061 (Colo.App.2010) (“Contracts must be construed as a whole, and specific phrases and terms should not be interpreted in isolation.”); Campo......
-
Groh v. Westin Operator, LLC
...See Walcott, 964 P.2d at 612. Thus, I would also affirm summary judgment on these grounds. See, e.g., Newflower Market, Inc. v. Cook, 229 P.3d 1058, 1061 (Colo.App.2010) (“If the trial court reached the correct result, we may affirm its determination on different grounds.”) (citing Barham v......
-
Battle N., LLC v. Sensible Hous. Co.
...does not apply in these circumstances, though our reasoning differs somewhat from the district court's. See Newflower Mkt., Inc. v. Cook, 229 P.3d 1058, 1061 (Colo.App.2010) ("If the trial court reached the correct result, we may affirm its determination on different grounds.").1. Preservat......
-
Marks v. Gessler
...claims for relief. ¶ 51 The propriety of summary judgment presents an issue of law that we review de novo. Newflower Mkt., Inc. v. Cook, 229 P.3d 1058, 1061 (Colo.App.2010). Entry of summary judgment is appropriate only where the pleadings and supporting documents clearly demonstrate that n......
Request a trial to view additional results