Newman v. Mayor Of City Of Newport, 882.
| Citation | 57 A.2d 180 |
| Decision Date | 30 January 1948 |
| Docket Number | No. 882.,882. |
| Parties | NEWMAN et al. v. MAYOR OF CITY OF NEWPORT et al. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Rhode Island |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Superior Court, Newport County; Alberic A. Archambault, Judge.
Petition by Benjamin Newman and others against the Mayor of the City of Newport and others for writ of mandamus to compel consideration of petitioners' application for permits to construct approaches to gasoline station. Respondents' demurrer to the petition was sustained, and petitioners appeal.
Appeal sustained and case remitted for further proceedings.
Sheffield & Harvey and W. Ward Harvey, all of Newport, for petitioners.
Alexander G. Teitz, City Sol., of Newport, for respondents.
This is a petition to the superior court for a writ of mandamus. Respondents' demurrer was heard and sustained by that court, whereupon the petitioners appealed to this court.
The parties and the allegation of facts in this case are identical with those fully set forth in our opinion in Newman v. Mayor of Newport, R.I.1948, 57 A.2d 173, where, on certiorari, we quashed the record of the decision of the commissioner of public works and the affirmation thereof by the board of aldermen denying petitioners' application for access by means of curb cuts to land belonging to Benjamin and Ida Newman, which land could lawfully be used as a gasoline station.
We agree with respondents that, generally speaking, the function of mandamus is to compel performance of a clear legal duty; to command action, not to review action. Corbett v. Naylor, 25 R.I. 520, 522, 57 A. 303. And, further, that where the performance of an official duty involves the exercise of discretion, the officer cannot ordinarily be controlled with respect to the particular action he will take in the matter; he can only be directed to perform his duty under the law, but he cannot be directed to perform it in a particular way. If the officer is vested with authority to exercise reasonable discretion, his decision as a general rule is not subject to review or control by mandamus. Cruise & Smiley Construction Co. v. Town Council, 42 R.I. 408, 108 A. 419.
However, in the instant case the facts set out in the petition for mandamus, which were admitted by respondents' demurrer, present a most unusual situation. The commissioner not only denied the curb cuts for approaches to a proposed gasoline station on the Newman land, as shown on one of two alternative plats filed with the application for...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Adler v. Lincoln Housing Authority
...commission to perform a ministerial duty." Aniello v. Marcello, 91 R.I. 198, 202, 162 A.2d 270, 272 (1960) (citing Newman v. Mayor of Newport, 73 R.I. 435, 57 A.2d 180 (1948); McLyman, ex rel. Hogan v. Holt, 51 R.I. 96, 151 A. 1 (1930)). A housing authority may be compelled to perform a min......
-
Sullivan v. Marcello
... ... , filed in the office of the recorder of deeds of the city of Providence a description of certain real property and a ... 594, Gill v. Town Council, 47 R.I. 425, 133 A. 806, Newman v. Mayor of Newport, 73 R.I. 385, 57 A.2d 180, and Wolfe v ... ...
-
Parente v. Southworth
...453, 456, 231 A.2d 484, 485 (1967); Aniello v. Marcello, 91 R.I. 198, 202-03, 162 A.2d 270, 272 (1960). In Newman v. Mayor of Newport, 73 R.I. 435, 436, 57 A.2d 180, 181 (1948), the court "[W]here the performance of an official duty involves the exercise of discretion, the officer cannot or......
-
Rosen v. Restrepo
...a discretionary act. This would do violence to long-established standards governing the use of the writ. Newman v. Mayor of Newport, 73 R.I. 435, 436, 57 A.2d 180, 181 (1948). Nor is there any merit to plaintiffs' claim that defendant tax assessor had no discretion to refuse to assess all p......